Global programs / Tissue culture for crops project (TCCP)
Biotechnology can contribute significantly to the doubling of world food production that is likely to be needed in the next 40-50 years. DEC abstract (PN-ABC-417)
Key prj:9364137
32 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 9 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Biotechnology can contribute significantly to the doubling of world food production that is likely to be needed in the next 40-50 years. In Africa, for example, the major constraints to rapid increases in food production - drought, salinity, diseases, insect pests - can potentially be overcome by using genetic engineering to adapt species to virtually all climatic and growing conditions. Crop species could also be developed that would produce greater yields, have improved nitrogen fixation properties, and be capable of growing on smaller plots. These proceedings of the Third IPBNet Conference highlight the role of tissue culture and other novel biotechnologies in this effort. Included are formal papers in three areas: (1) plant breeding and genetics, including papers on maize breeding for stress tolerance, grain legume breeding, and sorghum breeding for stress tolerance; (2) tissue culture technology, including papers on the role of micropropagation in commercialization and on in vitro selection and field evaluation in cereal and legume tissue culture; and (3) novel biotechnologies, including papers on biotechnology and potato improvement, genetic approaches to stress tolerance
Source: DEC abstract, PN-ABC-417 (1989). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Indonesia, Asia, India, Thailand, Philippines, Southern Africa, Africa South of Sahara, Costa Rica, Kenya.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.95.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado State University. Dept. of Botany and Plant Pathology | implementer | 1985 to 1989 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| Colorado State University | implementer | 1989 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAN-4137-A-4053 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1985 to 1989 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| AID/DSAN-C-0273 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1985 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 72%; Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 7%; Program management, planning and administration 5%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of a short term tissue culture training course | 1989 | PN-ABC-804 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Colorado State University. Dept. of Biology | implementer | 1985 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Science and Technology. Ofc. of Agriculture | 1985 to 1989 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
| USAID. Bur. for Science and Technology. Ofc. of Agriculture | 1985 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Development Support | 1985 to 1989 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 8 sources |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.