Egypt programs / Agricultural policy reform program (APRP). Reform Design and Implementation Unit (RDI)

Agricultural policy reform program (APRP). Reform Design and Implementation Unit (RDI)

Name source: not recorded for this programScope: country, EgyptKind: program

Key prj:2630219

51 facts shown; 5 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 185 documents cite this program.

The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.

Project to provide the Government of Egypt (GOE) with short- and long-term TA necessary to support its agricultural policy reform program (263K000), which is aimed at reducing barriers to the privatization of Egypt's agricultural sector. The project will include four activities: (1) monitoring, verification, and evaluation of policy reforms; (2) assistance with implementation of reforms; (3) program management; and (4) medium- to long-term research on food security. The project will be managed by the Program Planning Committee (PPC), comprised of representatives of the GOE ministries and the private sector. Under the first activity, the project will provide short- and long-term TA to ensure that policy benchmarks established under the program are verifiable, monitor the GOE's progress toward these benchmarks as well as the progress of projectized activities, and evaluate the economic and social impact of the reform program, including the effects on employment generation and small farmers and women. To assist in the implementation of reforms, short- and long-term TA will be provided to design and implement policy analyses and studies, generate policy impact analyses, facilitate po

Source: DEC abstract, PD-ABL-658 (1995). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.

Operated in: Egypt.

Years: 1995 to 2003 years in documents
Implementer: Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI); Abt Associates, Inc.; Environmental Quality International; and 9 more 98 sources
Funder or award: USAID. Mission to Egypt; 263-C-97-00005; 263-C-97-00003
Purpose: Not available yet: the program's stated purpose has not been read from its documents.

Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents

not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far

No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.

Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule

When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years

Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from design document year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.

Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year

Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records

Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field

Organizations named on this program's documents.
Name	Role	Years	Basis	Evidence
Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI)	implementer	1997 to 2002	Stated in a document	98 sources
Abt Associates, Inc.	implementer	1997 to 2003	Stated in a document	45 sources

Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records

Basis: read from a record field

Awards this program is funded through (identifiers, not amounts).
Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
263-C-97-00005 (contract, FY1997)	1997 to 2002	Stated in a document	99 sources
263-C-97-00003 (contract, FY1997)	1997 to 2003	Stated in a document	45 sources

Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags

Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets

Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents

Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title	Year	Document	Why listed
Rice water use policy -- phase I : water monitoring and evaluation report	1999	PN-ACH-578	evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier)
Midterm assessment of the agricultural policy reform program in Egypt	2000	PD-ABS-484	evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier)
Irrigation management transfer : framework for monitoring and evaluation	2002	PN-ACS-709	evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier)

Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.

Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library

Name	Role	Years	Basis	Evidence
Egypt. Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation (MALR)	lead ministry	1997 to 2003	Likely, not confirmed	278 sources
Egypt. Ministry of Public Works and Water Resources	lead ministry	1998 to 2002	Likely, not confirmed	34 sources
Government of the Republic of Egypt	co signer	1995	Likely, not confirmed	1 source
Egypt. Ministry of Public Enterprises	lead ministry	2000	Likely, not confirmed	1 source
Egypt. Ministry of Trade and Supply (MoTS)	lead ministry	1999	Likely, not confirmed	1 source

Agricultural policy reform program (APRP). Reform Design and Implementation Unit (RDI)

Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers

Host-government counterpartsthe government body the program worked with

Name	Role	Years	Basis	Evidence
German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ)	implementer	1999	Stated in a document	1 source
Harvard University. Harvard Institute for International Development (HIID)	implementer	1998	Stated in a document	1 source
ARD-RAISE Consortium	implementer	2000	Stated in a document	1 source
El-Zanaty and Associates	implementer	2002	Stated in a document	1 source

Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
USAID. Mission to Egypt	1997 to 2003	Stated in a document	181 sources
USAID. Bur. for Global Programs, Field Support and Research. Center for Environment. Ofc. of Energy, Environment and Technology	1998 to 1999	Stated in a document	6 sources
USAID. Bur. for Global Programs, Field Support and Research. Center for Economic Growth	1998 to 2000	Stated in a document	3 sources
USAID. Bur. for Global Programs, Field Support and Research. Center for Environment	1998	Stated in a document	2 sources
American Manufacturers Export Group	2000	Stated in a document	1 source
Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI)	2000	Stated in a document	1 source
USAID. Bur. for Global Programs, Field Support and Research. Center for Environment. Ofc. of Environment and Natural Resources	2000	Stated in a document	1 source
USAID. Bur. for Global Programs, Field Support and Research. Center for Economic Growth and Agricultural Development. Ofc. of Agriculture and Food Security	2000	Stated in a document	1 source
USAID. Mission to Egypt	1995	Stated in a document	4 sources

What this program was

Where it worked0

Places1

Timelineyears: years in documents

Political context

Implementers12

Awards and funding sources18

Topic tags15

Similar programs

Evaluations and lessons3

Documents by lifecycle stage185years in documents

Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers

Host-government counterpartsthe government body the program worked with