Egypt programs / Agricultural policy reform program (APRP). Reform Design and Implementation Unit (RDI)
Project to provide the Government of Egypt (GOE) with short- and long-term TA necessary to support its agricultural policy reform program (263K000), which is aimed at reducing barriers to the privatization of Egypt's agricultural sector. DEC abstract (PD-ABL-658)
Key prj:2630219
51 facts shown; 5 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 185 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Project to provide the Government of Egypt (GOE) with short- and long-term TA necessary to support its agricultural policy reform program (263K000), which is aimed at reducing barriers to the privatization of Egypt's agricultural sector. The project will include four activities: (1) monitoring, verification, and evaluation of policy reforms; (2) assistance with implementation of reforms; (3) program management; and (4) medium- to long-term research on food security. The project will be managed by the Program Planning Committee (PPC), comprised of representatives of the GOE ministries and the private sector. Under the first activity, the project will provide short- and long-term TA to ensure that policy benchmarks established under the program are verifiable, monitor the GOE's progress toward these benchmarks as well as the progress of projectized activities, and evaluate the economic and social impact of the reform program, including the effects on employment generation and small farmers and women. To assist in the implementation of reforms, short- and long-term TA will be provided to design and implement policy analyses and studies, generate policy impact analyses, facilitate po
Source: DEC abstract, PD-ABL-658 (1995). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Egypt.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Egypt, 1995 to 2003 185 sources
Scope: country: Egypt. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from design document year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI) | implementer | 1997 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 98 sources |
| Abt Associates, Inc. | implementer | 1997 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 45 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 263-C-97-00005 (contract, FY1997) | 1997 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 99 sources |
| 263-C-97-00003 (contract, FY1997) | 1997 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 45 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 18%; Agriculture: policy, land tenure and land reform 17%; Agriculture: agribusiness, processing, marketing, agricultural finance 10%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rice water use policy -- phase I : water monitoring and evaluation report | 1999 | PN-ACH-578 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Midterm assessment of the agricultural policy reform program in Egypt | 2000 | PD-ABS-484 | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| Irrigation management transfer : framework for monitoring and evaluation | 2002 | PN-ACS-709 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Environmental Quality International |
| implementer |
| 1997 to 2002 |
| Stated in a document |
| 39 sources |
| Management Systems International, Inc. (MSI) | implementer | 1997 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 35 sources |
| International Resources Group (IRG) | implementer | 1998 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 35 sources |
| Winrock International | implementer | 1998 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 34 sources |
| Nile Consultants | implementer | 1998 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 32 sources |
| Datex, Inc. | implementer | 1998 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ) | implementer | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Harvard University. Harvard Institute for International Development (HIID) | implementer | 1998 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| ARD-RAISE Consortium | implementer | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| El-Zanaty and Associates | implementer | 2002 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Basis: basis not stated; shown as likely, not confirmed
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egypt. Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation (MALR) | lead ministry | 1997 to 2003 | Likely, not confirmed | 278 sources |
| Egypt. Ministry of Public Works and Water Resources | lead ministry | 1998 to 2002 | Likely, not confirmed | 34 sources |
| Government of the Republic of Egypt | co signer | 1995 | Likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| Egypt. Ministry of Public Enterprises | lead ministry | 2000 | Likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| Egypt. Ministry of Trade and Supply (MoTS) | lead ministry | 1999 | Likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| 1997 to 2003 |
| Stated in a document |
| 44 sources |
| PCE-I-96-00002 (idiq, FY1996) | 1998 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 35 sources |
| 263-0219-C-7005 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1998 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
| 263-C-96-00077 (contract, FY1996) | 1998 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| 263-0233-C-6050 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PCE-I-99-00001 (idiq, FY1999) | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1995 to 2003 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 185 sources |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.