74 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 5 support mechanisms (not programs); 55 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
No description yet. The site only shows one with its source.
Operated in: Guatemala, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Moldova, Liberia, Nepal, Africa South of Sahara, Cambodia, Burundi, Peru, Indonesia, Nigeria, Georgia, Honduras, Mali, Ethiopia, Malawi, Haiti, South Africa, Ghana, Latin America, Morocco, Paraguay, West Bank, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, India, Colombia, Zambia, El Salvador, Tunisia.
Years
2013 to 2022 award start, end from document years
Implementer
NORC at the University of Chicago; Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Institute 37 sources
Funder or award
USAID. Bur. for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance. Center of Excellence on Democracy, Human Rights and Governance; OAA-M-13-00013; GS10F0033M
Purpose
Not available yet: the program's stated purpose has not been read from its documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. · Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. · Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. Confidence not stated.
How we know this
How sure we are: not stated.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. · Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. · Source: initiative records, start year
Began during the Barack Obama administration (2009–2017). Based on its first award year, 2013. This places the program in time only; it does not mean that administration started it.
No document or official record says which initiative or administration launched this program.
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. · Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. · Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Rule of law and human rights 16%; Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 15%; Good governance 15%
Topic tags (15)
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
GovernanceDEC topic tag, PA-00T-CZX, PA-00T-D13 and 3 more, 2014 to 2020, confidence 1; 16 records
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. · Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. · Source: linked evaluation documents
Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title
Year
Document
Why listed
Final performance evaluation of the monitoring Nepal's peace process and constitution drafting process project : final report
Appendix 7 Nicaragua case study : DRG learning, evaluation, and research activity : mid-term performance evaluation for the legal enabling environment project II (LEEP II)
DEC topic tag, PA-00T-D13, PA-00K-2VF and 3 more, 2014 to 2022, confidence 1; 11 records
Political participationDEC topic tag, PA-00K-2VF, PA-00M-2J6 and 3 more, 2014 to 2022, confidence 0.999; 11 records
SurveysDEC topic tag, PA-00K-JW1, PA-00T-DTN and 3 more, 2015 to 2022, confidence 0.994; 10 records
CommunitiesDEC topic tag, PA-00M-2WB, PA-00T-HJR and 3 more, 2015 to 2022, confidence 0.993; 9 records
AntibodiesDEC topic tag, PA-00T-CZX, PA-00K-97R and 3 more, 2014 to 2018, confidence 1; 8 records
Virgin landDEC topic tag, PA-00T-PF3, PA-00T-WRX and 3 more, 2018 to 2022, confidence 0.977; 8 records
Environmental educationDEC topic tag, PA-00K-JW1, PA-00K-TXK and 3 more, 2015 to 2022, confidence 0.962; 7 records
Civil service reformDEC topic tag, PA-00T-P1C, PA-00T-P1D and 3 more, 2015 to 2018, confidence 0.952; 7 records
Child welfare servicesDEC topic tag, PA-00M-2WB, PA-00Z-83M and 3 more, 2015 to 2021, confidence 0.991; 6 records
VotingDEC topic tag, PA-00K-2VF, PA-00M-2J6 and 3 more, 2014 to 2019, confidence 0.99; 6 records
WomenDEC topic tag, PA-00T-D12, PA-00T-PKC and 3 more, 2018 to 2020, confidence 0.986; 6 records
DyesDEC topic tag, PA-00T-D12, PA-00T-B8F and 3 more, 2018 to 2022, confidence 0.97; 6 records
Anticorruption interventionsDEC topic tag, PA-00M-2J6, PA-00M-NZ2 and 3 more, 2015 to 2019, confidence 0.97; 5 records
Voter verificationDEC topic tag, PA-00K-2VF, PA-00M-2J6 and 3 more, 2014 to 2019, confidence 0.956; 5 records
Appendix 8 Tunisia case study : DRG learning, evaluation, and research activity : mid-term performance evaluation for the legal enabling environment project II (LEEP II)
Appendix 1 Azerbaijan case study : DRG learning, evaluation, and research activity : final performance evaluation for the legal enabling environment project II (LEEP II)
Appendix 2 El Salvador case study : DRG learning, evaluation, and research activity : final performance evaluation for the legal enabling environment project II (LEEP II)
Appendix 3 Nigeria case study : DRG learning, evaluation, and research activity : final performance evaluation for the legal enabling environment project II (LEEP II)
The effect of corruption on political behavior in the Peruvian Amazon : impact evaluation of informational campaigns to increase awareness of corruption in politics