Regional programs / African Biodiversity Collaborative Group (ABCG) (BATS)
This document is an update of the Environmental Threats and Opportunities Assessment (ETOA) that was conducted in 2003. DEC abstract (PN-ADN-537)
Key awd:RLA-A-07-00043
181 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 1 support mechanism (not programs); 376 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The program, known as BATS, received an extension for its work from USAID/Africa.1 The program is carried out by a consortium of seven United States-based international conservation non-governmental organizations (NGOs).2 The award provides technical support and enables the program to share lessons learned to assist USAID/AFR/SD, Africa Missions and local and national organizations in Africa.1
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Africa, Tanzania, Africa South of Sahara, Kenya, Congo Democratic Republic, Ethiopia, Ghana, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia, Nepal, Pakistan, Haiti, Gabon, East Africa, South Africa, Southern Hemisphere, Zimbabwe, Equatorial Guinea, Cameroon, Malawi, Central African Republic, Republic of the Congo, Mozambique, Rwanda, Madagascar, Central Africa, Ghana, Liberia, Botswana, West Africa, Uganda, Philippines, South Sudan, Ethiopia, Burkina Faso, Panama, Zambia.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: regional. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How sure we are: 1.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Africa Biodiversity Collaborative Group (ABCG) | implementer | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 317 sources |
| World Wildlife Fund-U.S. (WWF-U.S.) | implementer | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 56 sources |
Contracts and vehicles that served this program (evaluation, M&E, research). Never counted as programs. Source: document metadata
A support mechanism is never counted as a program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| RLA-A-07-00043 (cooperative agreement, FY2007) | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 726 sources |
| LAG-A-99-00048 (cooperative agreement, FY1999) | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 692 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Natural resources and biodiversity (forests, wildlife, water resources) 48%; Environment, general policy and planning 22%; Program management, planning and administration 4%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| An evaluation of potential bushmeat alternatives in Equatorial Guinea | 2010 | PA-00K-423 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Africa Biodiversity Collaborative Group (ABCG) : performance evaluation report | 2015 | PB-AAC-020 | evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) (New York, NY) | implementer | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 56 sources |
| Conservation International | implementer | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 47 sources |
| African Wildlife Foundation (AWF) | implementer | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 44 sources |
| The Nature Conservancy (TNC) | implementer | 2011 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 41 sources |
| Jane Goodall Institute | implementer | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 37 sources |
| World Resources Institute (WRI) | implementer | 2008 to 2015 | Stated in a document | 30 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 2012 to 2013 |
| Stated in a document |
| 7 sources |
| EPP-I-03-00014 (idiq, FY2003) | 2008 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| EPP-I-03-00013 (idiq, FY2003) | 2011 to 2012 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| OAA-M-13-00012 (task order, FY2013) | 2015 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Africa Regional | 2008 to 2011 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| Botswana | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Malawi | 2012 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Mozambique | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Rwanda | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Tanzania | 2012 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Uganda | 2011 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.