Zimbabwe programs / Zimbabwe Works (ZW)
The Zimbabwe:Works (Z:W) project was implemented from January 2015 to December 2017 by the International Youth Foundation (IYF).1 A performance evaluation of the Zimbabwe: Works Project provided findings, conclusions and recommendations.2 Project activities reached 20,168 direct beneficiaries against a target of 18,500.1
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Zimbabwe.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate.
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
A few documents to read first. Each opens in the side panel, with the PDF to download.
Evaluation studies and evaluation-type documents linked to this program.
| Title | Year | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Final performance evaluation for the Zimbabwe:works programme | 2014 | Linked evaluation |
| Zimbabwe:works : end of project performance evaluation | 2017 | Linked evaluation |
| Zimbabwe : works impact evaluation report | 2018 | Linked evaluation |
Awards, topics, similar programs and how to read this page.
Operated in Zimbabwe, 2014 to 2018 3 sources
Scope: country: Zimbabwe. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 613-LA-12-00001 |
| 2014 to 2017 |
| Stated in a document |
| 2 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Zimbabwe | 2014 to 2017 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zimbabwe | 2014 to 2017 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
Sector profile (computed): Economic opportunity (microenterprise, jobs, skills, poverty reduction) 55%; Private sector competitiveness 14%; Basic education (early childhood, primary, secondary, literacy, teachers) 9%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
16 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 3 documents cite this program.
Program key awd:613-LA-12-00001