Regional programs / Women's integrated legal literacy (WILL)
Final report of the contractor, Chemonics International Inc., on a project (11/93-11/97) to promote the rule of law in the Central Asian republics of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan. DEC abstract (PD-ABQ-257)
Key prj:1100007
93 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 81 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Final report of the contractor, Chemonics International Inc., on a project (11/93-11/97) to promote the rule of law in the Central Asian republics of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan. Operating as the American Legal Consortium (ALC), the project adopted a civil society orientation, focusing almost exclusively on NGO and legal information development. In these areas, ALC combined a small grants program with TA in the areas of legal analysis and research, coalition-building, financial management, technical conferences and seminars, and legislative drafting and advocacy. In all, 56 grants were awarded to 54 grantees. The achievements of the NGO recipients of ALC's assistance were noteworthy. In the areas of law and public policy reform, legal services, access to legal and policy information, and support to other NGOs, ALC's NGO counterparts were at the forefront of forging more progressive and pluralistic societies in the region. NGO achievements in advocacy and policy reform through sustained dialogue with their respective governments were especially remarkable in light of the authoritarian political environment in the region. Some of the most hopeful
Source: DEC abstract, PD-ABQ-257 (1997). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Russia, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Uganda, Kyrgyzstan, New Independent States, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Moldova, United Arab Emirates, Armenia, Central and Eastern Europe, Azerbaijan.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: regional. How the scope was set is not described yet. Medium confidence.
How sure we are: 0.6.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winrock International. Institute for Agricultural Development | implementer | 2000 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 23 sources |
| Research Triangle Institute (RTI). Center for International Development | implementer | 1993 to 1995 | Stated in a document |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 122-0007-A-9022 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 2000 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 24 sources |
| CCN-0007-C-3110 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1993 to 1995 | Stated in a document | 17 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Rule of law and human rights 23%; Good governance 23%; Political competition and consensus-building 11%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AID cooperative agreement no. CCS-0007-A-00-2019-00 with the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs to promote a multi-party system, local government reform and civic education in the New Independent States (NIS) of the former Soviet Union | 1992 | PD-ABG-670 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| AID grant no. CCS-0007-G-00-2034-00 to Internews Network to assist in the establishment of an independent television news distribution system in the New Independent States (NIS) of the former Soviet Union to facilitate alternatives to the state - controlled monopoly of broadcasting | 1992 | PD-ABG-838 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Final report : participatory evaluation of the Counterpart Consortium cooperative agreement -- project 115-0001, Central Asian Republics |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 20 sources |
| Chemonics International Inc. | implementer | 1997 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 10 sources |
| National Judicial College | implementer | 1998 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 9 sources |
| Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation | implementer | 1998 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
| International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) | implementer | 1994 to 1995 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| Open Society Institute | implementer | 2000 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES) | implementer | 1995 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Counterpart International | implementer | 2000 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| American Bar Association (ABA) | implementer | 2000 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| U.S. Dept. of the Treasury | implementer | 1998 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| AFL-CIO. Free Trade Union Institute | implementer | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Management Systems International, Inc. (MSI) | implementer | 1994 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Georgia State University. College of Business Administration | implementer | 1994 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) | implementer | 1994 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| International Republican Institute (IRI) | implementer | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Andersen Consulting | implementer | 1995 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| International Management Services | implementer | 1994 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Georgia State University | implementer | 1998 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| ACDI/VOCA | implementer | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Datex, Inc. | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 1998 to 2000 |
| Stated in a document |
| 9 sources |
| AEP-I-96-00030 (idiq, FY1996) | 1998 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 9 sources |
| CCN-0007-A-4081 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1995 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| 122-0007-A-9019 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1999 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| CCS-0007-A-4081 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1994 to 1995 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| 118-A-97-00282 (cooperative agreement, FY1997) | 1997 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| 110-0007-A-4020 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| 119-A-97-00282 (cooperative agreement, FY1997) | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| 121-0007-G-7201 (grant, fiscal year not recorded) | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| AEP-5468-I-6012 (idiq, fiscal year not recorded) | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| CCN-0007-A-4096 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1994 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| CCN-0007-C-4004 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1997 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| CCS-0007-A-2019 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1992 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| CCS-0007-A-2021 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| CCS-0007-G-2034 (grant, fiscal year not recorded) | 1992 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| CCS-0007-G-2075 (grant, fiscal year not recorded) | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| AEP-0085-I-19-2060 (task order, fiscal year not recorded) | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1993 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 31 sources |
| Uzbekistan | 1999 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 29 sources |
| NIS Regional | 1992 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 7 sources |
| Kazakhstan | 1994 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1994 to 1995 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Moldova | 1995 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Armenia | 1995 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Azerbaijan | 1995 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Tajikistan | 1994 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Ukraine | 1995 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| 1996 |
| PD-ABN-627 |
| linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Civic initiatives program for democratic and economic reform in Russia (CIP) : mid-term evaluation final report | 1996 | PD-ABQ-273 | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| USAID cooperative agreement no. 118-A-00-97-00282-00 with the International Research & Exchanges Board to provide support for the sustaining partnerships into the next century (SPAN) program | 1997 | PD-ABQ-161 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| USAID/Russia independent television program : in-house survey of the program participants | 1999 | PD-ABS-549 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| USAID award no. 122-0007-A-00-9019-00 to Counterpart International to provide support for a program entitled Counterpart makhalla [mahalla] initiative for Uzbekistan | 1999 | PD-ABS-467 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Sustaining partnerships into the next century (SPAN) project : mid-term evaluation report | 2000 | PD-ABS-498 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Womens integrated legal literacy (WILL) project : 2001 annual evaluation | 2002 | PD-ABZ-587 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Womens integrated legal literacy (WILL) project : 2002-2003 evaluation survey | 2003 | PN-ACW-994 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Womens integrated legal literacy (WILL) project : 2002-2003 evaluation survey [Russian] | 2003 | PN-ACW-995 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.