Burkina Faso programs / Victory against malnutrition plus (ViMPlus)
A USAID Implementing Partner implements Victory against Malnutrition Plus (ViMPlus), a Development Food Security Activity from to improve food security and resiliencethe ability to respond to crisesamong 486,000 vulnerable Burkinabe in… IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-72DFFP18CA00008)
Key awd:72DFFP18CA00008
26 facts shown; 1 unconfirmed link; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 7 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
A USAID Implementing Partner implements Victory against Malnutrition Plus (ViMPlus), a Development Food Security Activity from to improve food security and resiliencethe ability to respond to crisesamong 486,000 vulnerable Burkinabe in Center-North Region. A central component of the USAID Resilience in the Sahel Enhanced (RISE) II initiative, this intervention works across multiple sectors, including agriculture, disaster risk management, health, livelihoods, nutrition, and water and sanitation.
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-72DFFP18CA00008 (2018). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Burkina Faso. 4 other countries are only tagged on documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Burkina Faso, 2019 to 2021 7 sources
Scope: country: Burkina Faso. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. Medium confidence.
How sure we are: 0.778.
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Programs that came before or after this one. A stated link names a document; a likely link is read from the text. Source: succession links
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACDI/VOCA | implementer | 2019 to 2021 | Stated in a document | 7 sources |
| Tufts University. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy | implementer | 2021 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 72DFFP18CA00008 (cooperative agreement, FY2018) | 2019 to 2021 | Stated in a document | 7 sources |
| FFP-A-11-00005 (cooperative agreement, FY2011) | 2021 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Years |
|---|
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Food assistance (Food for Peace, famine response) 29%; Monitoring, evaluation and performance measurement 19%; Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 15%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualitative Findings From the First Phase of a Mixed Methods Study on the Sustainability of the ViM Project in Kaya, Burkina Faso | 2021 | PA-00Z-7TQ | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Africa |
| 2019 to 2021 |
| Stated in a document |
| 4 sources |
| Africa South of Sahara | 2019 to 2021 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| French speaking Africa | 2019 to 2021 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| West Africa | 2019 to 2021 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| Basis |
|---|
| Evidence |
|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Humanitarian Assistance (BHA) | 2019 to 2021 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 4 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burkina Faso | 2020 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |