Tanzania programs / Water and development alliance (WADA) Tanzania coastal management partnership (TCMP)
This environmental flow assessment (EFA) is a management tool that will assist the Wami-Ruvu Basin Water Office (WRBWO) and other water management authorities meet the challenges of balancing the diverse needs for water in a rapidly… DEC abstract (PN-ADN-809)
Key nam:water and development alliance wada tanzania coastal management partnership
13 facts shown; 1 unconfirmed link; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 3 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
This environmental flow assessment (EFA) is a management tool that will assist the Wami-Ruvu Basin Water Office (WRBWO) and other water management authorities meet the challenges of balancing the diverse needs for water in a rapidly changing landscape. The process of conducting an EFA brings together specialists from different disciplines as well as stakeholders in the basin, and the emergent product is a quantitative estimate of the flow needs of the environment. This report is a synthesis of the key findings and conclusions of a longer technical report of the Wami EFA is aimed at the integrated water resource management practitioner. This synthesis describes the process and project outcomes of the environmental flow assessment (EFA) conducted in the Wami River Sub-Basin during 2007. The Wami EFA is one of the first projects of its kind to be facilitated by a basin water office in Tanzania, and represents a realistic, proactive approach to water resources management. Similar work was recently conducted by the Pangani River Basin Water Office. This report summarizes findings, and shares the approach used and lessons learned that can be transferred and replicated in other water
Source: DEC abstract, PN-ADN-809 (2008). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Tanzania.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Tanzania, 2008 3 sources
Scope: country: Tanzania. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How sure we are: 1.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from first seen; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Rhode Island. Coastal Resources Center (CRC) | implementer | 2008 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Florida International University (FIU) | implementer | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Tanzania | 2008 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Coca-Cola Africa Foundation | 2008 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Natural resources and biodiversity (forests, wildlife, water resources) 45%; Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 28%; Water supply, sanitation and hygiene 14%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanzania. Ministry of Water and Irrigation. Wami-Ruvu Basin Water Ofc. (WRBWO) | lead ministry | 2008 | Likely, not confirmed basis not stated; shown as likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| 2008 |
| Stated in a document |
| 3 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanzania | 2008 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 3 sources |