Cambodia programs / Tech for Green Cities (T4GC)
(Cambodia): .With FY 2020 funds, the activity will use 'civic tech' tools that increase access to information to strengthen constructive efforts aimed at holding local governments and service providers accountable for improving solid waste… IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-72044219C00002)
Key awd:72044219C00002
10 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 1 document cites this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
(Cambodia): .With FY 2020 funds, the activity will use 'civic tech' tools that increase access to information to strengthen constructive efforts aimed at holding local governments and service providers accountable for improving solid waste management. These tools also link to and support the 3Rs (Reduction, Reuse and Recycle), to reduce solid waste production in Cambodia at the source. As this will be the final tranche of funding for this activity, efforts will focus on ensuring the sustainability of the use of the civic tech tools by the beneficiaries...The activity contributes to the Mission Objective 1.2 (CDCS DO1) of "Strengthening credible voices to promote fundamental democratic principles and human rights" and to CDCS Intermediate Result 1.2 "Build strong, resilient and politically engaged civil society groups through support to strengthen the organizational and technical capacity of civil society organizations, business associations, trade unions, the private sector, and individuals to advocate and engage for policy reforms and government accountability." This activity also supports the National Security Strategy priority to "extend the influence of the United States
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-72044219C00002 (2019). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Cambodia.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 72044219C00002 (contract, FY2019) | 2020 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 50%; Basic education (early childhood, primary, secondary, literacy, teachers) 14%; Good governance 9%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library