Nigeria programs / State Accountability, Transparency and Effectiveness (State2State)
(Nigeria): .. .With FY 2022 funds this activity will:Strengthen governance systems (with a focus on public financial management and procurement, as well as monitoring and evaluation) related to the delivery of services in key sectors… IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-72062020C00002)
Key awd:72062020C00002
12 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 1 document cites this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
(Nigeria): .. .With FY 2022 funds this activity will:Strengthen governance systems (with a focus on public financial management and procurement, as well as monitoring and evaluation) related to the delivery of services in key sectors; Increase government responsiveness to citizen needs and priorities including provision of services; andImprove government and civil society capacity to manage conflict.This activity will address some of the principal underlying conditions stifling economic growth, stunting human development, and fueling conflict in Nigeria including: poor governance, corruption, weak institutions, and limited basic service delivery at the state and local levels.This multi-sectoral activity will work with selected states and local governments to improve the governance of primary health care and basic education services with emphasis placed on strengthening linkages and information exchange between government units. By enhancing the capacity of local civil society partners to monitor government performance, hold local authorities accountable for prudent expenditure of public resources, and improve the delivery of key services via emphasis on good governance,
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-72062020C00002 (2020). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Nigeria.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAI Global, LLC | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 2023 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 72062020C00002 (contract, FY2020) | 2023 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) | 2023 | Stated in a document read from a record field |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Conflict mitigation and reconciliation 50%; Good governance 14%; Agriculture: policy, land tenure and land reform 6%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 1 source |