Global programs / Strengthening tenure and resource rights (STARR)
Key awd:OAA-TO-13-00019
48 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 51 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The program is the Strengthening Tenure and Resource Rights (STARR) Evaluation, Research and Communications Task Order.1 The task order was awarded to Cloudburst Consulting Group, Inc. on May 6, 2013.1 The program is designed to create, expand, and communicate the results of evidence-based knowledge around best land tenure and property rights practices.2 The program entered its fifth and final year of implementation, running from May 2017 to April 2018.3
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Africa South of Sahara, Zambia, Ethiopia, Burkina Faso, Liberia, Kenya, Guinea, Mozambique, Indonesia, East Africa, Tanzania, Ghana, Latin America, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, South America.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How sure we are: 1.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudburst Consulting Group, Inc. | implementer | 2013 to 2018 | Stated in a document | 42 sources |
| Indufor North America, LLC. | implementer | 2017 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| OAA-TO-13-00019 (task order, FY2013) | 2013 to 2018 | Stated in a document | 50 sources |
| OAA-I-12-00030 (idiq, FY2012) | 2013 to 2018 | Stated in a document | 49 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Good governance 18%; Program management, planning and administration 17%; Monitoring, evaluation and performance measurement 16%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact evaluation of property rights and artisanal diamond development project II (PRADD II) : report on baseline findings | 2015 | PA-00T-69K | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Performance evaluation of the partnering for adaptation and resilience-agua (PARA-agua) activity : final evaluation report | 2015 | PA-00M-1D9 | evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
| Ethiopia strengthening land tenure and administration program endline report : an impact evaluation of the effects of second-level land certification relative to first-level certification | 2016 | PA-00M-3ZP | linked as an evaluation of this program |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 2016 to 2018 |
| Stated in a document |
| 3 sources |
| 663-TO-13-00005 (task order, FY2013) | 2016 to 2017 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| AID-OAA-I-12-00030"\ (award, fiscal year not recorded) | 2013 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| OAA-M-13-00017 (task order, FY2013) | 2016 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| OAA-TO-13-00016 (task order, FY2013) | 2018 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Economic Growth, Education and Environment. Ofc. of Land Tenure and Resources Management | 2013 to 2018 | Stated in a document | 49 sources |
| USAID. Mission to Ethiopia | 2016 to 2017 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| USAID. Bur. for Economic Growth, Education and Environment | 2015 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| 2016 |
| PA-00T-6B8 |
| linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Performance evaluation of the mobile application to secure tenure (MAST) pilot | 2016 | PA-00M-7ZK | evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
| Community Land Protection Program (CLPP) Performance Evaluation (PE): Pre-Analysis Plan | 2016 | PA-00T-68D | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Impact evaluation of Ethiopia land administration to nurture development : report on baseline findings | 2016 | PA-00T-692 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Community land protection program : midline performance evaluation report | 2017 | PA-00T-68K | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Impact evaluation of the land administration to nurture development project in Afar, Ethiopia : report on baseline findings | 2017 | PA-00T-68R | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Tenure and Global Climate Change (TGCC) Zambia Pilot Impact Evaluation: Pre-Analysis Plan | 2017 | PA-00T-6BJ | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Tenure and global climate change (TGCC) : evaluation report | 2018 | PA-00T-791 | evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier) |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.