Sri Lanka programs / Social Cohesion and Reconciliation Program (SCORE)
(Sri Lanka): .SCORE promotes reconciliation and social cohesion addressing underlying grievances that led to Sri Lanka's civil war, mistrust between ethnic and religious groups, and segregation in the political, economic, and cultural… IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-72038318CA00003)
Key awd:72038318CA00003
18 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 8 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
(Sri Lanka): .SCORE promotes reconciliation and social cohesion addressing underlying grievances that led to Sri Lanka's civil war, mistrust between ethnic and religious groups, and segregation in the political, economic, and cultural arena..SCORE addresses structural drivers that enable violent extremism. It acts as a change agent to Sinhalese Buddhist and Muslim communities in the Southern, Central, and Eastern Provinces, promote open dialogue, and extend support to coexistence societies and inter-religious committees to strengthen social harmony and religious tolerance. SCORE will partner with Ministry of Justice, transitional justice mechanisms such as Office of National Unity and Reconciliation, Office of Missing Persons (OMP)and Parliamentary select committees to address issues of communal and religious harmony, and national unity. It will support social media campaigns to counter fake news, social engineering, and radicalization of youth along religious lines, and provide sub-grants to religious networks to carry out social cohesion and reconciliation activities. Through small grants and technical assistance it will promote youth networks to strengthen the moderate youth
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-72038318CA00003 (2018). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Sri Lanka.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Communities | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 2018 to 2020 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 8 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 72038318CA00003 (cooperative agreement, FY2018) | 2018 to 2020 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 8 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Conflict mitigation and reconciliation 31%; Disaster readiness, prevention and recovery 19%; Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 13%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.