Uganda programs / Strengthening Citizens' Engagement in Elections (SCENE)
(Uganda): With FY 2022 funds, SCENE will deepen engagement, debate, and consensus on constitutional, political, and legal reforms. IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-72061719CA00001)
Key awd:72061719CA00001
15 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 1 document cites this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
(Uganda): With FY 2022 funds, SCENE will deepen engagement, debate, and consensus on constitutional, political, and legal reforms. SCENE will engage citizens to increase trust of, and constructive engagement with, the public sector agencies charged with legislation and the implementation of constitutional and electoral reforms. .SCENE will directly engage key Government of Uganda (GOU) actors, including Parliament, the Electoral Commission, and local law enforcement, to reduce political fragility in a country that has never seen a peaceful transition of power. SCENE will bring together electoral civil society organizations to conduct joint strategic planning, and engage and partner with GOU counterparts to support freer, more peaceful political engagement in Uganda..
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-72061719CA00001 (2019). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Place: not recorded.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
No operating country recorded. Scope is set from the countries the documents name most often, and none passed the rule.
Scope: country: Uganda. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 72061719C00003 (contract, FY2019) | 2023 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| 72061719CA00001 (cooperative agreement, FY2019) | 2023 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Years |
|---|
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Political competition and consensus-building 51%; Good governance 39%; Rule of law and human rights 7%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strengthening citizen engagement in elections (SCENE) activity : mid-term learning review : final report | 2023 | PA-021-SMK | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 2023 |
| Stated in a document read from a record field |
| 1 source |
| Basis |
|---|
| Evidence |
|---|
| USAID. Mission to Uganda | 2023 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |