Madagascar programs / Sustainable approaches to viable environmental management (SAVEM)
The destruction of Madagascar's primary forests through agricultural clearing poses a grave threat to the island's biodiversity. DEC abstract (PN-ABN-306)
Key prj:6870110
44 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 23 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The destruction of Madagascar's primary forests through agricultural clearing poses a grave threat to the island's biodiversity. This report assesses the potential of the planned Sustainable and Viable Environmental Management (SAVEM) Project to minimize this threat by implementing Integrated Conservation Development Projects (ICDP's), which link resource conservation to income-generating activities, in the peripheral zones of Madagascar's protected areas. Key issues treated include: general guidelines for ICDP's; potential activities (by sector) in the peripheral zones; criteria for Community Action Grants (CAG's) and Protected Area Development Grants (PADG's); and implementing organizations for both types of grants. The ICDP framework was found to be a focused but flexible conceptual model with some capacity to protect biodiversity and improve the economic situation of people living within Madagascar's peripheral areas. However, Madagascar's bleak macro-economic situation makes the possibility of sustained economic development in the peripheral zones doubtful at the present time. In general, the team recommends that the smaller CAG's be used to respond to basic needs in heal
Source: DEC abstract, PN-ABN-306 (1992). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Madagascar. 4 other countries are only tagged on documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Madagascar, 1991 to 2001 23 sources
Scope: country: Madagascar. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tropical Research and Development, Inc. | implementer | 1994 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 11 sources |
| Association Nationale pour la Gestion des Aires Protegees (ANGAP) (Madagascar) | implementer | 1994 to 1996 | Stated in a document |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Natural resources and biodiversity (forests, wildlife, water resources) 45%; Environment, general policy and planning 20%; Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 6%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation a mi-parcours : approches durables en vue de la gestion rationnelle de l'environnement -- projet SAVEM Madagascar (687-0110) | 1994 | PD-ABJ-938 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Protecting biological diversity : Madagascar case study | 1994 | PN-ABT-452 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 1996 |
| Stated in a document |
| 1 source |
| Oceania | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Caribbean | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Asia | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Tropical Forest Management Trust | implementer | 1996 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Datex, Inc. Environment and Natural Resources Information Center | implementer | 1994 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI) | implementer | 1992 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Price Waterhouse | implementer | 1997 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Private Agencies Collaborating Together (PACT) | implementer | 1992 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| SAVEM Steering Committee | implementer | 1997 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pact, Inc. | implementer | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Chemonics International Inc. | implementer | 1991 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| University of Maryland at College Park. Dept. of Zoology | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 1994 |
| Stated in a document |
| 3 sources |
| PDC-5517-I-0103 (idiq, fiscal year not recorded) | 1991 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Madagascar | 1991 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 17 sources |
| U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) | 1994 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Association Nationale pour la Gestion des Aires Protegees (ANGAP) (Madagascar) | 1996 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| 013495 - | 1996 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| USAID. Bur. for Global Programs, Field Support and Research. Center for Environment | 1994 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| USAID. Bur. for Science and Technology. Ofc. of Forestry, Environment and Natural Resources | 1991 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| USAID. Bur. for Research and Development. Ofc. of Environment and Natural Resources | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Madagascar | 1991 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 22 sources |
| Development Support | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.