Global programs / Rational pharmaceutical management plus (RPM+)
After three years of support from the Global Drug Facility (GDF), the Government of Kenya is interested in applying for a second term grant. DEC abstract (PD-ACH-071)
Key prj:936310402
119 facts shown; 6 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 258 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The program works in more than 20 developing countries to provide technical assistance to strengthen drug and health commodity management systems.1 The program is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development under cooperative agreement HRN-A-00-00-00016-00.1 In 2002, the program conducted a rapid, mostly qualitative tuberculosis procurement assessment in Moldova.2 USAID-Senegal requested the program to provide technical input to a survey in collaboration with other partners.3
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Kenya, Vietnam, Senegal, Namibia, Zambia, Nicaragua, Ivory Coast, Tanzania, West Africa, Latin America, East Africa, Ghana, Africa South of Sahara, Ethiopia, Dominican Republic, Peru, Rwanda, Nigeria, Romania, Congo Democratic Republic, Ethiopia, Ghana, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia, Nepal, Pakistan, Haiti, Mali, Caribbean, Uganda, Madagascar, Brazil, Cambodia, Southern Hemisphere, China, Ecuador, Paraguay.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.95.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Programs that came before or after this one. A stated link names a document; a likely link is read from the text. Source: succession links
Regional Programs 7 NARRATIVES—REGIONAL PROGRAMS ASIA AND THE NEAR EAST—REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT MISSION–ASIA Overview SPS, while building on the work of RPM Plus in the Asian region, will strengthen the ability of regional policy makers, health care providers, and institutions to improve pharmaceutical management, with an added emphasis on governance, financing of pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical services, institutional capacity build
RPM Plus Activities and Products Status Report Country Programs 76 FINANCIAL INFORMATION On September 28, 2000, Management Sciences for Health was awarded the RPM Plus cooperative agreement, the follow-on to the Rational Pharmaceutical Management Project.
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Management Sciences for Health (MSH) | implementer | 2001 to 2009 | Stated in a document | 257 sources |
| Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH) | implementer | 2003 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| HRN-A-00-00016 (cooperative agreement, FY2000) | 2001 to 2009 | Stated in a document | 257 sources |
| GPO-I-05-00032 (idiq, FY2005) | 2007 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Health systems, policy and finance (general health) 64%; Private sector competitiveness 6%; Program management, planning and administration 6%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antimicrobial resistance module for population-based surveys | 2006 | PN-AEB-834 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Renforcement de la gestion des medicaments dans les zones de sante pour la prise en charge communautaire en Republique Democratique du Congo : evaluation rapide, juin 2006 | 2006 | PN-ADI-449 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Evaluation du systeme d'approvisionnement, de gestion et de distribution des antipaludiques au Burundi, Decembre 2006 : rapport d'evaluation | 2007 | PN-ADJ-118 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
This was followed in three weeks with a two day retreat for introducing the three projects to the staff, introduce SPS, the follow-on project to RPM Plus, and jointly plan on coordination and harmonization of activities as appropriate.
| Stop TB Partnership | implementer | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| World Health Organization (WHO). Dept. of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB) | implementer | 2003 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Basis: basis not stated; shown as likely, not confirmed
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peru. Ministry of Health | lead ministry | 2002 | Likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| Rwanda. Ministry of Health | lead ministry | 2005 | Likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| Zambia. Ministry of Health | lead ministry | 2005 | Likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| Zambia. Central Board of Health | implementing agency | 2005 | Likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| Rwanda. Ministry of Health. National Reference Laboratory | lead ministry | 2005 | Likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| Mexico. Secretaria de Salud | lead ministry | 2007 | Likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| 2008 |
| Stated in a document |
| 2 sources |
| HRN-A-92-00059 (cooperative agreement, FY1992) | 2002 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| HRN-A-98-00044 (cooperative agreement, FY1998) | 2004 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| GHN-A-07-00002 (cooperative agreement, FY2007) | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ctr for Population, Health & Nutrition | 2001 to 2009 | Stated in a document | 55 sources |
| Kenya | 2004 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 17 sources |
| Namibia | 2004 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 13 sources |
| Senegal | 2001 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 13 sources |
| Vietnam | 2001 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 12 sources |
| Nicaragua | 2002 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 10 sources |
| Ivory Coast [Cote d'Ivoire] | 2004 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 9 sources |
| Zambia | 2003 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 9 sources |
| Tanzania | 2005 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
| WEST AFRICA REGIONAL | 2004 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
| Ghana | 2004 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 7 sources |
| Africa Regional | 2005 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| Dominican Republic | 2004 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| Ethiopia | 2004 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| Latin American Regional | 2003 to 2005 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| Peru | 2002 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| Congo DR | 2004 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Nigeria | 2005 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Romania | 2004 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Rwanda | 2005 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Mali | 2004 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| Uganda | 2004 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| Asia Regional | 2005 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Brazil | 2004 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Madagascar | 2004 to 2005 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Caribbean Regional | 2006 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| China, People's Republic of | 2005 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Ecuador | 2004 to 2005 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Moldova | 2002 to 2005 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Paraguay | 2005 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| REDSO/ESA | 2004 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Albania | 2006 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Angola | 2007 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Armenia | 2006 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Benin | 2007 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Burundi | 2007 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Cambodia | 2007 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| East Africa (Regional Dev Office) | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Gambia | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Guatemala | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Guinea | 2007 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Mexico | 2007 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| NIS Regional | 2004 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Regional Ctr for Southern Africa (RCSA) | 2004 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Southern Africa Regional | 2004 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Thailand | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.