Russia programs / Russia longitudinal monitoring survey (RLMS)
The Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS) is a series of nationally representative surveys, implemented between 1992 and 1995, on key development-related aspects of the Russian Federation. DEC abstract (PN-ACB-164)
Key prj:1180001
20 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 5 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS) is a series of nationally representative surveys, implemented between 1992 and 1995, on key development-related aspects of the Russian Federation. The present survey examines trends in health conditions over the study's time-frame. Key findings are as follows. (1) Between 1994 and 1995 there has been a decline in the quantity of alcohol consumed in the country, though it is still considerably higher than in 1992. (2) Since 1992, the prevalence of drinking among adults has declined steadily. Among teenagers, prevalence declined until 1996, then began to increase. (3) In 1995, smoking prevalence was at its highest, with large increases over the previous 3 years among teenagers and adult females. Almost a quarter of teenagers smoke -- an increase of 44% since 1992. (4) Urban residents rate their air and water quality lower than do rural residents. However, compared with 1994, fewer people in 1995 thought that the quality of air and water has deteriorated recently, or were willing to pay for improvements. (5) There are no shifts in the patterns of health services use. Any notable differences between rounds are most likely attributable to
Source: DEC abstract, PN-ACB-164 (1996). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Russia.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Carolina Population Center | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 1996 to 2005 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 5 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 118-0001-G-5275 (grant, fiscal year not recorded) | 1996 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 2 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Russia | 1996 to 2005 | Stated in a document read from a record field |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Macroeconomic foundation for growth 13%; Basic education (early childhood, primary, secondary, literacy, teachers) 12%; Health systems, policy and finance (general health) 12%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 5 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1996 to 2005 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 5 sources |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.