Global programs / Resilience Evaluation Analysis and Learning (REAL 2) Program (RMS)
Resilience evaluation analysis and learning (real 2) program to provide evidence and learning to inform design and implementation of usaid-funded resilience investments for the benefit of implementers and public good and b) continued… IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-7200AA20LA00004)
Key awd:7200AA20LA00004
26 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 6 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Resilience evaluation analysis and learning (real 2) program to provide evidence and learning to inform design and implementation of usaid-funded resilience investments for the benefit of implementers and public good and b) continued support for the broader development community, including host governments. the specific activities are linked to: a) generation of key resilience evidence; b) continued thought leadership on resilience measurement and analysis in frontier areas; and c) collaboration, learning, and adapting to enhance implementation of resilience programming.
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-7200AA20LA00004 (2020). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Africa, Asia, Southeast Asia, Ukraine, Nigeria, Yemen.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How sure we are: 1.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Save the Children (U.S.) | implementer | 2021 to 2024 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| TANGO International Inc. | implementer | 2022 to 2024 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7200AA20LA00004 (leader with associates, FY2020) | 2021 to 2024 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 6 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Resilience and Food Security (RFS) | 2021 to 2024 | Stated in a document |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Disaster readiness, prevention and recovery 46%; Conflict mitigation and reconciliation 8%; Economic opportunity (microenterprise, jobs, skills, poverty reduction) 6%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Mercy Corps | implementer | 2022 to 2023 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 6 sources |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.