Regional programs / Regional activity to promote integration through dialogue and policy implementation (RAPID) RAPID task order 2.1 activity
According to the United Nations Family Planning Agency (UNFPA), 22% of households in Southern Africa and 60% of households in Western Africa are headed by women, giving poverty an increasingly feminine face in sub-Saharan Africa. DEC abstract (PN-ACS-677)
The RAPID Telecommunications Task Team performed a preliminary regulatory and policy audit of three jurisdictions: Mozambique, Swaziland, and Namibia.1 As part of the review, the task team also interviewed industry participants in Botswana and South Africa.1
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Southern Hemisphere, Mozambique, Namibia, Lesotho, Uganda, South Africa, Botswana, Swaziland, Africa South of Sahara, Tanzania, North America, Seychelles, Mauritius, Zimbabwe, Angola, Malawi, Zambia, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate.
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
A few documents to read first. Each opens in the side panel, with the PDF to download.
Showing 10 of 16 documents.
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemonics International Inc. | implementer | 2000 to 2004 | Stated in a document | 32 sources |
| Transportation and Economic Research Associates, Inc. (TERA) | implementer | 2001 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
Awards, topics, similar programs and how to read this page.
Scope: regional. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How sure we are: 1.
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 690-I-00-00149 (idiq, FY2000) | 2000 to 2004 | Stated in a document |
Showing 10 of 11 documents.
Districts, regions and facilities named in the program's own documents, not verified sites. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far.
Sample Built from district names in Malawi documents while the full place data loads; it is not yet the finished place list.
Solid: the documents describe the program's work there. Faint: named in the program's documents. Bigger means more mentions. Shown: district; squares are facilities.
| 34 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Africa. Regional Center for Southern Africa (RCSA) | 2001 to 2004 | Stated in a document | 30 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regional Ctr for Southern Africa (RCSA) | 2000 to 2004 | Stated in a document | 30 sources |
| Botswana | 2002 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Lesotho | 2004 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Mozambique | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Namibia | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Sector profile (computed): Transport infrastructure (roads, rail, air, water) 22%; Macroeconomic foundation for growth 10%; Good governance 7%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
42 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 34 documents cite this program.
Program key nam:regional activity to promote integration through dialogue and policy implementation rapid rapid task order 2 1 activity
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.