Global programs / Resilience evaluation, analysis and learning (REAL)
The purpose of this activity is to produce a strong body of evidence to be disseminated and used by key stakeholders on how to measure and strengthen resilience. IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-AID-OAA-A-16-00033)
Key awd:OAA-A-16-00033
53 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 105 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The purpose of this activity is to produce a strong body of evidence to be disseminated and used by key stakeholders on how to measure and strengthen resilience. TOPS activities include: 1) Capacity building to close technical gaps 2)Reviewing local context and providing targeted technical assistance in response - including the development guidance on conducting risk and resilience assessments 3)Strengthen food security networks for enhanced collaboration, cooperation and information sharing - including conducting learning sessions, presentations, technical meetings and emergency thought leadership around resilience related issues 4)Field testing new and adaptive methods, tools and approaches - including contributing to conducting three FTF impact evaluations. 4)This activity aims to measure the effectiveness of our efforts to save lives, foster economic growth and reduce poverty.
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-AID-OAA-A-16-00033 (2016). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Africa, Africa South of Sahara, Asia, Niger, Horn of Africa, Nepal, Ethiopia, East Africa, Burkina Faso, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Yemen, Syria, Kenya, Republic of the Congo, Afghanistan, Congo Democratic Republic, Ethiopia, Ghana, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia, Nepal, Pakistan, Haiti, Ukraine, Zimbabwe, Mali, Somalia.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How sure we are: 1.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TANGO International Inc. | implementer | 2017 to 2023 | Stated in a document | 56 sources |
| Mercy Corps | implementer | 2017 to 2022 | Stated in a document | 46 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| OAA-A-16-00033 (cooperative agreement, FY2016) | 2017 to 2023 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 105 sources |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Resilience and Food Security (RFS) | 2017 to 2023 | Stated in a document |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Disaster readiness, prevention and recovery 62%; Agriculture: livestock, animal health, fisheries, aquaculture 5%; Monitoring, evaluation and performance measurement 5%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pastoralist Areas Resilience Improvement and Market Expansion (PRIME) Project Impact Evaluation Report of Recurrent Monitoring Survey 2 (2015/16) | 2018 | PA-00T-GTP | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| PRIME Project Impact Evaluation: Report of Recurrent Monitoring Survey 2 | 2018 | PA-00T-NM6 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Série de notes d’orientations pratiques pour la mesure de la résilience 5 : Conception et planification du suivi et de l’évaluation de la résilience au niveau des activités | 2018 | PA-00Z-QP6 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Save the Children (U.S.) |
| implementer |
| 2017 to 2022 |
| Stated in a document |
| 21 sources |
| Food for the Hungry International (FHI) | implementer | 2020 to 2021 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| Helen Keller Worldwide. Helen Keller International (HKI) | implementer | 2017 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| World Vision Relief Organization | implementer | 2017 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| CARE International | implementer | 2017 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Food for the Hungry, Inc. (FHI) | implementer | 2020 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Save the Children | implementer | 2019 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| TANGO International | implementer | 2019 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 102 sources |
| USAID. Ofc. of Food for Peace (FFP) | 2019 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Feed the Future Initiative (FTF) (U.S.) | 2019 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| 2018 |
| PA-00Z-T15 |
| evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Options de mesure de la résilience et d’évaluation des capacités de résilience : Approches légère, intermédiaire et complète pour mesurer la résilience et les capacités de résilience des ménages et des communautés | 2018 | PA-00Z-T18 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| RISE Program Impact Evaluation: Report of Recurrent Monitoring Survey | 2020 | PA-00X-B31 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Évaluation sur l'impact de l’initiative pour le Renforcement de la Résilience au Sahel (RISE) : Rapport d'enquête de suivi récurrent de 2018-2019 | 2020 | PA-00Z-T17 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Rapid Resilience Learning Brief: Harnessing Local Sources of Social Cohesion in Niger | 2021 | PA-00X-WDS | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.