Global programs / Rural and agricultural incomes with a sustainable environment (RAISE)
An assessment of USAID/Nepal's Strategic Objective 1, which represents USAID/Nepal's programs in agriculture and natural resource management, was conducted from November 3 to December 17, 1999. The purpose of this assessment is to… DEC abstract (PD-ABS-482)
Key prj:9364224
190 facts shown; 2 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 416 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
An assessment of USAID/Nepal's Strategic Objective 1, which represents USAID/Nepal's programs in agriculture and natural resource management, was conducted from November 3 to December 17, 1999. The purpose of this assessment is to review USAID/Nepal's Strategic Objective 1 for Agriculture and Natural Resources (SO 1), Increased sustainable production and sales of forest and high value agricultural products. Specifically, the purpose of this report is to assess progress to date, advise on the validity of SO 1's current approach given the development context of Nepal and reduced funding from AID/W, assess implementation mechanisms, review the SO framework and indicators, and, if necessary, propose changes. (Excerpt, modified)
Source: DEC abstract, PD-ABS-482 (1999). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Bolivia, Uganda, Rwanda, Nicaragua, Guinea, Central America, Madagascar, Mexico, Guatemala, Indonesia, Philippines, El Salvador, Latin America, Dominican Republic, West Africa, Colombia, Timor-Leste, Nigeria, Romania, Brazil, Morocco, Honduras, Ecuador, Mozambique, Peru, Angola, Thailand, Costa Rica, Tanzania, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
Districts, regions and facilities named in the program's own documents, not verified sites. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far.
Sample Built from district names in Malawi documents while the full place data loads; it is not yet the finished place list.
Solid: the documents describe the program's work there. Faint: named in the program's documents. Bigger means more mentions. Shown: district, region or province; squares are facilities.
Showing 8 of 32 places.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.95.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemonics International Inc. | implementer | 1999 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 310 sources |
| Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI) | implementer | 1999 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 56 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCE-I-99-00003 (idiq, FY1999) | 1999 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 282 sources |
| PCE-I-99-00002 (idiq, FY1999) | 1999 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 57 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: agribusiness, processing, marketing, agricultural finance 21%; Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 11%; Financial sector (banks, credit, microfinance, markets) 10%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Midterm assessment of the agricultural policy reform program in Egypt | 2000 | PD-ABS-484 | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| Evaluation of tea units : Kitabi, Gisakura & Mata | 2001 | PN-ADJ-081 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Evaluation of recent SPS [sanitary & phytosanitary]-related programs in Central America | 2003 | PN-ACU-008 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Associates in Rural Development, Inc. (ARD) | implementer | 1999 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 28 sources |
| Friends Consult (U) Ltd. | implementer | 2005 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 16 sources |
| ARD-RAISE Consortium | implementer | 1999 to 2004 | Stated in a document | 12 sources |
| TechnoServe | implementer | 2000 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 7 sources |
| J. E. Austin Associates, Inc. | implementer | 2002 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| Helen Keller Worldwide. Helen Keller International (HKI) | implementer | 2002 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Basis: basis not stated; shown as likely, not confirmed
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philippines. Bur. for Environmental Management. Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources | implementing agency | 2003 | Likely, not confirmed | 4 sources |
| Indonesia. National Development Planning Agency (BAPPENAS) | implementing agency | 2004 | Likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| 2001 to 2005 |
| Stated in a document |
| 46 sources |
| PCE-I-99-00001 (idiq, FY1999) | 1999 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 38 sources |
| PCE-I-820-99-00003 (task order, FY1999) | 2004 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 9 sources |
| PCE-I-03-99-00002 (task order, FY1999) | 2002 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
| PCE-I-96-00003 (idiq, FY1996) | 2003 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
| PCE-I-26-99-00003 (task order, FY1999) | 2005 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| 497-A-99-00033 (cooperative agreement, FY1999) | 2002 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| PCE-I-800-99-00002 (task order, FY1999) | 2002 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| OUT-PCE-I-815-99-00003-00 (award, fiscal year not recorded) | 2003 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| PCE-I-00-00003 (idiq, FY2000) | 2005 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| PCE-I-25-99-00003 (task order, FY1999) | 2005 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| PCE-I-807-99-00003 (task order, FY1999) | 2002 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| AEP-I-00-00022 (idiq, FY2000) | 2003 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| AEP-I-821-00-00022 (task order, FY2000) | 2003 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PCE-I-24-99-00003 (task order, FY1999) | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PCE-I-801-99-00003 (task order, FY1999) | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PCE-I-821-99-00003 (task order, FY1999) | 2006 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PCE-I-826-99-00003 (task order, FY1999) | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PCI-I-820-99-00003 (task order, FY1999) | 2006 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PCI-I-99-00003 (idiq, FY1999) | 2006 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bolivia | 2001 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 67 sources |
| Uganda | 2001 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 51 sources |
| Rwanda | 1999 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 49 sources |
| Nicaragua | 2000 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 46 sources |
| Guinea | 2004 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 25 sources |
| Central America Regional | 2003 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 16 sources |
| Madagascar | 2001 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 16 sources |
| Mexico | 2004 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 12 sources |
| Indonesia | 1999 to 2004 | Stated in a document | 11 sources |
| Latin American Regional | 2002 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 11 sources |
| Philippines | 2002 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 9 sources |
| East Timor | 2005 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
| WEST AFRICA REGIONAL | 2002 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
| Colombia | 2001 to 2005 | Stated in a document | 7 sources |
| Guatemala | 2000 to 2005 | Stated in a document | 7 sources |
| Nigeria | 2002 | Stated in a document | 7 sources |
| Romania | 2004 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 7 sources |
| El Salvador | 2003 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Morocco | 2003 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Angola | 2007 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| Bosnia and Hercegovina | 2005 to 2006 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Economic Growth Office | 2003 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Peru | 2003 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| REDSO/ESA | 2001 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Brazil | 2003 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Ctr for Economic Growth & Ag Development | 2005 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Ctr for Environment | 2006 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Tanzania | 2001 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Vietnam | 2007 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Yemen | 2005 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Zambia | 2006 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Africa Regional | 2007 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Bulgaria | 2004 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Dominican Republic | 2003 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Ecuador | 2004 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Ethiopia | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Europe Regional | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Ghana | 2004 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Haiti | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Honduras | 2003 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Kenya | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Mozambique | 2002 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Nepal | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Paraguay | 2004 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Reg Office Cent America & Panama (ROCAP) | 2004 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Regional Ctr for Southern Africa (RCSA) | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| South Africa | 2002 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Egypt | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| 2003 |
| PD-ABY-533 |
| linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Evaluation of the impact [i.e. incidence] & mapping of 'Crown Gall' (agrobacterium tumefaciens) in the Rubus species producing communities in Tarija & Cochabama[, Bolivia] = Evaluacion de la incidencia y mapeo de la Agalla de Corona (agrobacterium tumefaciens) en comunidades productoras de especies del genero Rubus en Tarija y Cochabamba | 2004 | PN-ADA-775 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| MAPA project gender evaluation = Evaluacion de genero del proyecto MAPA | 2005 | PN-ADK-135 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Diseno del sistema de monitoreo y evaluacion (M&E) : IPRC | 2005 | PN-ADE-675 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Pesticide evaluation report and safer use action plan (PERSUAP) for mango production on small farms near Kindia and plantations near Forecariah and Kankan | 2005 | PN-ADJ-189 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Amended pesticide evaluation report and safer use action plan (PERSUAP) -- linking agricultural markets to producers (LAMP) : pesticide procurement and use in the fruit sub-sector | 2005 | PN-ADJ-411 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Amended pesticide evaluation report and safer use action plan (PERSUAP) -- linking agricultural markets to producers (LAMP) : pesticide procurement and use in the vegetable sub-sector | 2005 | PN-ADJ-412 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Amended pesticide evaluation report and safer use action plan (PERSUAP) : global development alliance (GDA) for rural employment generation activity (REGA) | 2006 | PN-ADJ-413 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Evaluation of U-Trust's low cost housing loan product : final report | 2006 | PN-ADK-935 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Evaluation of DCA guarantee programs & impact : 2002-2007 -- final report | 2007 | PD-ACK-985 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.