Global programs / Private Sector Partnerships Project (PSP-1) (PSP-one)
The purpose of this primer is to document and promote best practices gleaned from worldwide experience in training private sector providers. DEC abstract (PN-ADN-730)
Key awd:GPO-I-01-04-00007
40 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 18 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The purpose of this primer is to document and promote best practices gleaned from worldwide experience in training private sector providers. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)-funded Private Sector Partnerships-One (PSP-One) project has reviewed literature and developed case studies of recent private provider training events to collect and analyze lessons learned (see Table 1, Training Case Studies, at the end of this primer). The findings will aid donors, program managers, curriculum designers, and trainers to successfully design and implement training of private providers. Again, because numerous resources exist on general aspects of training, this primer does not address those topics but rather focuses on aspects that are unique to training private providers. (Author abstract)
Source: DEC abstract, PN-ADN-730 (2008). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Africa South of Sahara, Indonesia, Nicaragua, India, Ghana, Latin America, Philippines, Peru, Egypt, Ukraine, Nigeria, Zambia, Uganda.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How sure we are: 1.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abt Associates, Inc. | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 2006 to 2009 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 16 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPO-I-04-00007 (idiq, FY2004) | 2006 to 2009 | Stated in a document | 18 sources |
| GPO-I-01-04-00007 (task order, FY2004) | 2006 to 2009 | Stated in a document | 17 sources |
Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Health systems, policy and finance (general health) 40%; Family planning and reproductive health 21%; Private sector competitiveness 5%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saathiya youth friendly initiative : evaluation report | 2009 | PN-ADP-177 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Global Health. Ofc. of Population and Reproductive Health | 2006 to 2009 | Stated in a document | 12 sources |
| USAID. Bur. for Global Health. Ofc. of Health, Infectious Diseases, and Nutrition | 2007 to 2009 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ctr for Population, Health & Nutrition | 2006 to 2008 | Stated in a document | 7 sources |
| Africa Regional | 2007 to 2009 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Egypt | 2008 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| India | 2009 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Nicaragua | 2009 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Philippines | 2009 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Uganda | 2009 | Stated in a document | 1 source |