Global programs / Promoting women in development (PROWID)
Case studies of four U.S. NGO field projects that offer replicable lessons learned in working with women are presented: the Regional Oils project of Appropriate Technology International in Tanzania and Zimbabwe; the Warmi and Woman-Child… DEC abstract (PN-ACA-179)
Key awd:FAO-A-95-00030
64 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 26 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The program aims to support cutting-edge research related to women in development.1 The program includes three competitive components.1 Eleven PROWID projects focused upon domestic violence.2
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: India, Mexico, Latin America, Bulgaria, Russia, Gambia, Albania, Thailand, Central Asia, Guatemala, Philippines, Tanzania, Ecuador, Poland, Senegal, New Independent States, Liberia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Bolivia, Egypt, Zimbabwe, Moldova, Sri Lanka, Romania.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. Low confidence.
How sure we are: 0.5.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from evidence year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Center for Research on Women (ICRW) | implementer | 1995 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 26 sources |
| Centre for Development and Population Activities (CEDPA) | implementer | 1997 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 22 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAO-A-95-00030 (cooperative agreement, FY1995) | 1996 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 22 sources |
| FAO-0100-A-5030 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1995 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 51%; Rule of law and human rights 11%; Conflict mitigation and reconciliation 10%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| InterAction | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Centre for Social Research | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Global Programs, Field Support, and Research. Ofc. of Women in Development | 1995 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 26 sources |
| USAID. Mission to India | 1996 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| USAID. Bur. for Latin America and the Caribbean | 1998 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| India | 1996 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| Ctr for Women in Development | 2000 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Latin American Regional | 1998 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Mexico | 1999 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Program and Policy Coordination | 1995 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Russia | 1999 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Bulgaria | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Ecuador | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Europe Regional | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Gambia | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Liberia | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| NIS Regional | 1997 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Philippines | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Poland | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Sri Lanka | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.