Global programs / Global project 940-0004 · 1979–1992 · International Executive Service Corps (IESC)
Presents final Bureau report on a project (FY70-88) to finance volunteer management TA through the International Executive Service Corps (IESC). DEC abstract (PD-ABE-293)
Key prj:9400004
34 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 12 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Presents final Bureau report on a project (FY70-88) to finance volunteer management TA through the International Executive Service Corps (IESC). A.I.D. has provided support to IESC since its inception as a collaborative effort between the U.S. Government and the U.S. business community. A.I.D. support provides over 2/3 of IESC's annual budgetary requirements and is essential for the funding of IESC's worldwide operations. The project came under the jurisdiction of the Bureau for Private Enterprise (PRE) in FY82. PRE encouraged IESC to coordinate its services with USAID Missions and to help Missions develop and implement their private sector strategies. To this end, IESC has negotiated numerous Mission-funded grant agreements. IESC's services have been directed to the private sector of host countries and in some cases to privatizing state-owned enterprises. Two programs developed under the PRE project -- American Business Linkage Enterprise and the Joint Venture Feasibility Fund -- were combined and funded as a separate project, the Trade and Investment Services Project. An impact evaluation produced in 1988 documents high Mission and client regard for IESC services. positive ef
Source: DEC abstract, PD-ABE-293 (1992). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Latin America, El Salvador, Morocco, Dominican Republic, Jordan.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.95.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Executive Service Corps (IESC) | implementer | 1985 to 1988 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Stichting to Promote Women's World Banking | implementer | 1986 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Civil society 28%; Program management, planning and administration 23%; Good governance 12%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| IESC grant agreement : PRE/PPR's [Bureau for Private Enterprise, Office of Policy and Program Review] 1984 annual review of compliance | 1985 | PD-ABK-257 | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
| Project assistance completion report : International Executive Service Corps | 1992 | PD-ABE-293 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 1985 |
| Stated in a document |
| 1 source |
| 608-0189-A-6080 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1986 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| LAC-0619-A-5093 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1986 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PDC-0100-G-7185 (grant, fiscal year not recorded) | 1986 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Private Enterprise | 1985 to 1988 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| USAID. Bur. for Private Enterprise | 1983 to 1986 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
Basis: read from a record field
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.