Global programs / ERAS
Two analyses - one of the constraints to the long-term growth of the Tunisian economy, especially its manufacturing sector, the other of the high administrative burden and lack of coherent focus of A.I.D.'s Private Sector Development… DEC abstract (PN-AAU-439)
Key prj:9365426
64 facts shown; 2 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 80 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Two analyses - one of the constraints to the long-term growth of the Tunisian economy, especially its manufacturing sector, the other of the high administrative burden and lack of coherent focus of A.I.D.'s Private Sector Development Project (PSDP) - preface this strategy for the future development of Tunisia's private sector. It is recommended that USAID help Tunisia alleviate constraints on production of export goods by redesigning the PSDP to focus on export promotion issues. Specifically, the project should: (1) establish a loan fund to finance the goods and equipment needed by small and medium exporters, and a hard currency fund for exclusive use by Tunisie Leasing clients; (2) use funds from the Financial Markets project for a constraint analysis study, long-term TA to Tunisia's financial sector, and mid-level commercial and development bank staff seminars; (3) strengthen the capacity of the Federation of Exporters (FEDEX) to provide market information and product development services to its members; and (4) help the Tunisian Union of Industry, Commerce, and Small Business (UTICA) become the focus of ongoing analysis of Tunisian export policies.
Source: DEC abstract, PN-AAU-439 (1985). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Bangladesh, Rwanda, Taiwan, Korea R, Latin America, Africa South of Sahara, Philippines, Ecuador, Peru, Dominican Republic, Malawi, Indonesia, West Africa, Pakistan, Africa, Tunisia, Israel, Senegal, Cyprus, Sri Lanka, Sierra Leone, Caribbean, Asia.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
Districts, regions and facilities named in the program's own documents, not verified sites. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far.
Sample Built from district names in Malawi documents while the full place data loads; it is not yet the finished place list.
Solid: the documents describe the program's work there. Faint: named in the program's documents. Bigger means more mentions. Shown: district; squares are facilities.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.95.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard University. Harvard Institute for International Development (HIID) | implementer | 1985 to 1991 | Stated in a document | 64 sources |
| Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI) | implementer | 1985 to 1991 | Stated in a document |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAN-5426-C-4098 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1985 to 1991 | Stated in a document | 69 sources |
| PDC-1096-I-4162 (idiq, fiscal year not recorded) | 1986 to 1987 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Private sector competitiveness 39%; Macroeconomic foundation for growth 13%; Economic opportunity (microenterprise, jobs, skills, poverty reduction) 11%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the impact of projects to promote small scale industrialization | 1987 | PN-AAY-257 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Michigan State University | implementer | 1985 to 1991 | Stated in a document | 35 sources |
| Devres, Inc. | implementer | 1986 to 1991 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Harvard University. Harvard Institute for International Development. Rural Development Studies | implementer | 1988 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Michigan State University. Dept. of Agricultural Economics | implementer | 1987 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Basis: basis not stated; shown as likely, not confirmed
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh. Planning Commission | implementing agency | 1987 to 1990 | Likely, not confirmed | 28 sources |
| Rwanda. Ministry of Finance and Economy | lead ministry | 1986 to 1988 | Likely, not confirmed | 18 sources |
| 1985 to 1987 |
| Stated in a document |
| 2 sources |
| PDC-0085-I-13-9089 (task order, fiscal year not recorded) | 1991 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Science and Technology. Ofc. of Rural and Institutional Development | 1985 to 1991 | Stated in a document | 42 sources |
| Harvard University. Harvard Institute for International Development (HIID) | 1985 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| USAID. Bur. for Science and Technology. Ofc. of Rural and Institutional Development | 1987 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | 1987 to 1990 | Stated in a document | 28 sources |
| Rwanda | 1986 to 1989 | Stated in a document | 12 sources |
| China, Republic of (Taiwan) | 1988 to 1989 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Dominican Republic | 1985 to 1988 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Ecuador | 1988 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Malawi | 1989 to 1990 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Peru | 1988 to 1989 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Philippines | 1985 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Senegal | 1988 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Sri Lanka | 1989 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Tunisia | 1985 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.