148 facts shown; 1 unconfirmed link; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 190 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The often overlooked contributions of women to Third World economies are explored in this brief of three individual papers. Emphasis is placed on the importance of informal economies, in which women play a leading role, and the rise of which is seen as resulting from two factors. The first is anti-development, which occurs when "distributional coalitions" of economically successful individuals or firms work to retain their status by denying others, particularly women, the means through which they became successful. The second factor is the government policies which, influenced to a great extent by these distributional coalitions, retard economic growth; a list of such policies is provided and exemplified by reference to individual countries, including some which deviate from the general rule. Evidence of the growing recognition of informal economies by Third World governments and of the growing success of women in reversing anti-development policies is provided.
Source: DEC abstract, PN-AAT-990 (1985). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Latin America, Caribbean, Kenya, Ecuador, Middle East, Asia, Burkina Faso, Nepal, Bolivia, Tunisia, Uganda, Yemen, Brazil, Morocco, Africa South of Sahara, Philippines, Honduras, Bangladesh, West Africa, Niger, Guatemala, Peru, Egypt, Pakistan, Chile, Zimbabwe, Southern Hemisphere, Senegal, Jamaica, Botswana.
Years
1979 to 1996 award start, end from document years
Implementer
The Futures Group International, Inc. (TFGI); Management Systems International, Inc. (MSI); Consortium for International Development (CID); and 29 more 120 sources
Funder or award
USAID. Bur. for Research and Development. Ofc. of Women in Development; PDC-0100-Z-9044; PDC-0100-A-1135
Purpose
Not available yet: the program's stated purpose has not been read from its documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. · Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. · Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How we know this
How sure we are: 0.95.
OU code 930 is a central bureau code (9xx)
evidence countries (45): Ecuador 11, Kenya 11, Nepal 8, Burkina Faso 7, Bolivia 6, Uganda 5; top share 0.09, single-country share 0.07
dropped Ukraine tag on 5 Africa-context docs (taxonomy defect)
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. · Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. · Source: initiative records, start year
Began during the Jimmy Carter administration (1977–1981). Based on its first award year, 1979. This places the program in time only; it does not mean that administration started it.
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. · Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. · Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 61%; Program management, planning and administration 10%; Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 9%
Topic tags (15)
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Women in developmentDEC topic tag, PN-AAN-124, PN-AAN-025 and 3 more, 1981 to 1996, confidence 1; 130 records
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. · Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. · Source: linked evaluation documents
Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title
Year
Document
Why listed
Evaluation of RCUP's improved cookstove program with special emphasis on indoor air pollution sampling
Evaluation of the cooperative agreements between PPC/WID and CID [Consortium for International Development and MUCIA [Midwest University Consortium for International Activities]
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. · Source: document library
Women in development portfolio review : the identification of means to further promote the integration of gender considerations into USAID/Guatemala's program
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
Fact value
Bangladesh
Document
Final report : loan management and information system for the women enterprise development programme, Bangladesh, a final contractor/grantee report from 1994 PD-ABL-746