Tanzania programs / Tanzania project 621-0162 · 1985
Evaluates project to support women's self-help activities in Tanzania's Arusha Region. DEC abstract (PD-AAR-067)
Key prj:6210162
9 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 1 document cites this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Evaluates project to support women's self-help activities in Tanzania's Arusha Region. Final PES covers the period 7/82-9/84 and is based on document review, site visits, and interviews with beneficiaries and observers. The project has both increased the capability of the implementing Institute for Adult Education (IAE) to render services in rural areas and demonstrated the value of a participatory approach toward motivating rural women. A total of 1,280 previously uninvolved women (27% of women in the 16 project villages) have been mobilized, with a group retention rate of 77%. Of 17 groups formed, 15 are active, 12 of these cohesive, and 6 self-reliant; 11 of 25 group projects are operational, 3 are income-generating. Implementation of women's group activities required more IAE guidance and support staff than expected (as a result IAE did not field test its draft handbook). The use of audiocassette recorders during animation showed no essential benefits; consequently, the small group listening format was deleted, and meetings to decide on activities included all group members. The project held 160 village animation and training meetings plus 97 unplanned follow-up meetings to fac
Source: DEC abstract, PD-AAR-067 (1985). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Tanzania.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from evaluation period; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanzania | 1985 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 25%; Natural resources and biodiversity (forests, wildlife, water resources) 25%; Economic opportunity (microenterprise, jobs, skills, poverty reduction) 14%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arusha women's participation in development project, AWPID | 1985 | PD-AAR-067 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library