Morocco programs / Morocco project 608-0210 · 1991–1998 · agriculture · Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI)
While European trade policies have channeled Morocco's fruit and vegetable processing industry into increasingly competitive product lines and container sizes, Moroccan policies governing corporate and land ownership, as well as government… DEC abstract (PN-ABW-703)
Key prj:6080210
32 facts shown; 2 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 18 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The program was financed by USAID, the government of Morocco, and private companies under a contract with Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI).1 The DAI contract was a completion-type contract with a total estimated cost plus fixed fee of $13,437,702.2
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Morocco. 1 other country is only tagged on documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Morocco, 1991 to 1998 18 sources
Scope: country: Morocco. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI) | implementer | 1993 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 14 sources |
| Agribusiness Marketing Investissement | implementer | 1993 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 608-0210-C-2044 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1993 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 14 sources |
| 608-C-92-00044 (contract, FY1992) | 1998 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: agribusiness, processing, marketing, agricultural finance 71%; Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 8%; Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 3%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joint mid-term project evaluation -- accessing international markets (AIM) and Morocco agribusiness promotion (MAP) : final report | 1995 | PD-ABM-449 | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 1995 |
| Stated in a document read from a record field |
| 1 source |
| University of Idaho. College of Agriculture. Postharvest Institute for Perishables | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Fintrac, Inc. | implementer | 1998 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| The Futures Group International, Inc. (TFGI) | implementer | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Basis: basis not stated; shown as likely, not confirmed
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morocco. Ministry of Agriculture and Agricultural Development | lead ministry | 1997 | Likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| Government of Morocco | co signer | 1991 | Likely, not confirmed | 1 source |
| 1995 |
| Stated in a document |
| 2 sources |
| PDC-0100-Z-9044 (other, fiscal year not recorded) | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Morocco | 1993 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 16 sources |
| USAID. Mission to Morocco | 1991 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morocco | 1991 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 17 sources |
| East Africa (Regional Dev Office) | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.