Morocco programs / Morocco project 608-0078 · 1969–1974 · agriculture
AT THE OUTSET THE PROJECT WAS INTENDED TO REACH 12 MGMT AREAS COVERING 325000 HECTARES OF DEPLETED COMMUNAL RANGELANDS; SUCH A BROAD SCOPE PROVED UNWORKABLE. DEC abstract (PD-AAA-177-B1)
Key prj:6080078
8 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 12 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
AT THE OUTSET THE PROJECT WAS INTENDED TO REACH 12 MGMT AREAS COVERING 325000 HECTARES OF DEPLETED COMMUNAL RANGELANDS; SUCH A BROAD SCOPE PROVED UNWORKABLE. SCOPE WAS CHANGED TO 2 AREAS, 70000 HECTARES. STUDIES IN LAND MANAGEMENT, SEEDING TECHNIQUES, GRAZING SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTAL PLANTINGS TO TEST VARIETIES OF FORAGE SPECIES;COLLECTING LIVESTOCK DATA.ATTEMPTED COUP D'ETAT-7/71-PROJECT UNCERTAIN,2/72, IT WAS AGREED THAT THE US FIELD TECHNICIANS WOULDNOT BE REQUIRED UNDER THE 1973-77 5-YR PLAN.FY74 PROJECT WAS REVISED TO ASSIST IN UPGRADING OPERATIONAL CAPABILITES OF GOM ORGS FOR RANGE AND LIVESTOCK IMPROVEMENT,TRAINING.TESTING AND DEMONSTRATION OF METHODS OF RANGEIMPROVEMENT ACCOMPLISHED AS ORIGINAL OBJECTIVES.
Source: DEC abstract, PD-AAA-177-B1 (1970). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Morocco.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Morocco, 1969 to 1974 12 sources
Scope: country: Morocco. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from first seen; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Morocco | 1969 to 1974 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 8 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morocco | 1969 to 1974 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 12 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: livestock, animal health, fisheries, aquaculture 74%; Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 15%; Basic education (early childhood, primary, secondary, literacy, teachers) 6%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LIVESTOCK AND RANGELAND IMPROVEMENT | 1969 | PD-AAA-178-A1 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| LIVESTOCK AND RANGELAND IMPROVEMENT | 1970 | PD-AAA-178-B1 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| LIVESTOCK AND RANGELAND IMPROVEMENT | 1974 | PD-AAA-178-D1 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.