Regional programs / AOJ
This Rule of Law strategy for Brazil focuses on the judiciary, the independence of which is currently under threat. DEC abstract (PN-ABZ-343)
Key prj:5980669
58 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 14 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
This Rule of Law strategy for Brazil focuses on the judiciary, the independence of which is currently under threat. The report identifies the existing strengths of Brazil's judicial system -- respected judicial leaders, adequate financial resources, respected court decisions, existing Brazil-US institutional relationships, emerging recognition of court delay problems, emerging support institutions, national judicial identity, traditions of judge integrity, and recent reform initiatives -- as well as its weaknesses -- case disposition delay, lack of case management system, high litigant court costs, uncontrolled appellate caseloads, intersectoral conflicts, personalized trial court organization, lack of professional court administration, excessive number of appellate judgeships, excessive procedural formalism, commercial law rigidity, and lack of a tradition of building coalitions for judicial reform. A final section outlines a Rule of Law strategy for Brazil focused on strengthening: (1) legal institutions with appellate court management and structures for judicial system governance; (2) access to justice, via expansion of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures within cour
Source: DEC abstract, PN-ABZ-343 (1996). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Latin America, Peru, Haiti, Guatemala, Brazil, Bahamas, Honduras, Panama, Argentina, Costa Rica, Bolivia, Nicaragua.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: regional. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Center for State Courts (NCSC) | implementer | 1992 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 12 sources |
| National Center for State Courts (NCSC). Institute for Court Management (ICM) | implementer | 1991 | Stated in a document |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Good governance 64%; Rule of law and human rights 31%; Civil society 3%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the Costa Rica justice sector improvement project | 1992 | XD-ABH-630-A | evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Libra Foundation | implementer | 1994 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 1992 to 1993 |
| Stated in a document |
| 2 sources |
| LAC-0669-Q-10-1041 (task order, fiscal year not recorded) | 1995 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| LAC-0669-Q-14-1041 (task order, fiscal year not recorded) | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| 511-0669-C-1040 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| LAC-0669-Q-06-1041 (task order, fiscal year not recorded) | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Latin America and the Caribbean. Ofc. of Democratic Initiatives | 1991 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 12 sources |
| USAID. Mission to Peru | 1992 to 1993 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| USAID. Mission to Brazil | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| USAID. Mission to Guatemala | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| USAID. Mission to Honduras | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| USAID. Mission to Panama | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| USAID. Mission to Bolivia | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| USAID. Mission to Costa Rica | 1992 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| USAID. Mission to Nicaragua | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| USAID. Bur. for Latin America and the Caribbean. Ofc. of Democratic Initiatives | 1994 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latin American Regional | 1991 to 1994 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Peru | 1992 to 1993 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Bahamas | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Brazil | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Guatemala | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Haiti | 1995 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Honduras | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Panama | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Bolivia | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Costa Rica | 1992 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Nicaragua | 1993 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.