Regional programs / APENN

APENN

Project to increase nontraditional agricultural exports in Central America by strengthening private producer/exporter federations and providing TA and training to other involved personnel. DEC abstract (PD-AAS-854)

Name source: not recorded for this programScope: regionalKind: program

Key prj:5960108

Review evidence

42 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 56 documents cite this program.

The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.

The project is titled Non-Traditional Agricultural Export Support, project number 596-0108.1

Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.

Operated in: Central America, Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, Panama, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Latin America, Caribbean, Uganda, Peru, Belize, Mexico.

Years: 1986 to 1994 award start, end from document years
Implementer: Chemonics International Inc.; Samuel R. Daines Research Group, Inc.; AgriData Resources, Inc.; and 1 more 48 sources
Funder or award: USAID. Bur. for Latin America and the Caribbean. Regional Ofc. for Central American Programs (ROCAP); 596-0108-C-6060; PDC-0085-I-6097
Purpose: Not available yet: the program's stated purpose has not been read from its documents.

Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents

Districts, regions and facilities named in the program's own documents, not verified sites. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far.

Sample Built from district names in Malawi documents while the full place data loads; it is not yet the finished place list.

Solid: the documents describe the program's work there. Faint: named in the program's documents. Bigger means more mentions. Shown: region or province, district; squares are facilities.

Region or province · 8 mentions · 1987
District · 4 mentions · 1991
District · 1 mention · 1991

Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule

When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years

Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.

Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year

Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records

Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field

Organizations named on this program's documents.
Name	Role	Years	Basis	Evidence
Chemonics International Inc.	implementer	1987 to 1993	Stated in a document	48 sources
Samuel R. Daines Research Group, Inc.	implementer	1988	Stated in a document	2 sources

Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records

Basis: read from a record field

Awards this program is funded through (identifiers, not amounts).
Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
596-0108-C-6060 (contract, fiscal year not recorded)	1987 to 1993	Stated in a document	44 sources
PDC-0085-I-6097 (idiq, fiscal year not recorded)	1988	Stated in a document	2 sources

Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags

Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets

Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents

Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title	Year	Document	Why listed
Final report : collaborative evaluation and process consultation services to the non-traditional agricultural export support project (PROEXAG) in Central America	1988	PD-AAY-774	evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier)
Executive summary : collaborative evaluation and process consultation services to the non-traditional agricultural export support project (PROEXAG) in Central America	1988	PD-AAY-773	evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier)
Assessment of the non-traditional export support project and the export and industry support project in Central America	1994	PN-ABU-165	evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier)

Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.

Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library

APENN

Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers

Host-government counterpartsthe government body the program worked with

Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
USAID. Bur. for Latin America and the Caribbean. Regional Ofc. for Central American Programs (ROCAP)	1987 to 1993	Stated in a document	50 sources
USAID. Bur. for Latin America and the Caribbean. Regional Ofc. for Central American Programs (ROCAP)	1986 to 1993	Stated in a document	3 sources

Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
Reg Office Cent America & Panama (ROCAP)	1986 to 1994	Stated in a document	55 sources
Latin American Regional	1993	Stated in a document	1 source

What this program was

Where it worked3

Places13

Timelineyears: award years, end from document years

Political context

Implementers4

Awards and funding sources10

Topic tags15

Similar programs

Evaluations and lessons3

Documents by lifecycle stage56years in documents

Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers

Host-government counterpartsthe government body the program worked with