Ecuador programs / Ecuador project 518009203 · 1969–1970
GRANT & TECH ASSISTANCE ARE PROVIDED TO THE GOVT OF ECUADOR TO PROMOTE URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGS SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED TOWARD THE URBAN POOR IN THE NATION'S MAJOR CITIES. DEC abstract (PD-AAB-959-A1)
Key prj:518009203
18 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 3 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
GRANT & TECH ASSISTANCE ARE PROVIDED TO THE GOVT OF ECUADOR TO PROMOTE URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGS SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED TOWARD THE URBAN POOR IN THE NATION'S MAJOR CITIES. ECUADOR'S NATL PLANNING BOARD (NPB) WILL ADMINISTER THE PROJ & COORDINATE ACTIVITIES WITH THE ECUADORIAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION (EDF) & THE BANCO ECUATORIANO DE VIVIENDA (BEV). THE EDF WILL IMPLEMENT A SMALL BUSINESS SUPPORT PROG IN THE BARRIOS (LOW-INCOME AREAS) OF GUAYAQUIL. EDF & US CONTRACT PERSONNEL WILL FIRST STUDY SMALL BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES & OUTLINE THE CREDIT, TECHNICAL & PROMOTIONAL NEEDS OF SMALL BUSINESSES IN THE BARRIOS. IN ADDITION, THE EDF PERSONNEL WILL HIRE & SUPERVISE A TEAM OF UP TO EIGHT SMALL BUSINESS "PROMOTERS" WHO WILL ADVISE SMALL BUSINESSMEN. THIS PROJ ELEMENT WILL SUPPORT AID'S SMALL ENTERPRISE LOAN (PROJ 5180098) WHICH INCREASED EDF CREDIT FUNDS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES. THE US ADVISORS & EDF STAFF WILL SEEK PRIVATE SECTOR SUPPORT FOR JOB TRNG PROGS IN THE BARRIOS & IN ESTABLISHING A REGISTRY TO LINK TRAINEES WITH NEW JOB OPPORTUNITIES. OTHER US ADVISORS WILL ASSIST THE BEV TO IMPLEMENT A PILOT SITES & SERVICES (S&S) HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROG IN GUAYAQUIL. THE BEV WILL FINANCE STREETS,WATER,
Source: DEC abstract, PD-AAB-959-A1 (1969). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Ecuador.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from design document year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Ecuador | 1969 to 1970 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 3 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1969 to 1970 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 3 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Housing, urban and municipal infrastructure 31%; Transport infrastructure (roads, rail, air, water) 17%; Economic opportunity (microenterprise, jobs, skills, poverty reduction) 15%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library