Ecuador programs / Ecuador project 518-0023 · 1988
Field research was conducted on the traditional medicinal plants of the lowland Quijos Quichua people living in the Amazonian rain forest in eastern Ecuador. Under the direction of Quichua medicine men, some 120 species of plants were collected. Of the 80 or more native uses of these medicines, by far the most common were for treating symptoms suggestive of parasitic infections; other common uses are for pain management, female fertility and its regulation, and as anti-venoms. An extensive review of the ethnobotanical, pharmacological, chemical, and toxicological literature provided substantial collaboration of the Quichua traditional medicines; in fact, correlations between the literature and the field results were 2-3 times what could be attributed to random chance, thus reaffairming the value of studying traditional medicines in order to discover new therapeutic agents or new local sources of therapeutic agents. In some cases, however, the literature contradicted Quichuan use or indicated toxicity. No particular medicinal plant, therefore, can be assumed to be both safe and effective; thorough evaluations are needed. Medicinal plants with proven safety and efficacy can then
Source: DEC abstract, PN-ABC-296 (1988). The source's own text.
Operated in: Ecuador.
A few documents to read first. Each opens in the side panel, with the PDF to download.
One document mentions this program.
Awards, topics, similar programs and how to read this page.
Operated in Ecuador, 1988 1 source
Scope: country: Ecuador. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Ecuador | 1988 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1988 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Sector profile (computed): Natural resources and biodiversity (forests, wildlife, water resources) 35%; Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 20%; Health systems, policy and finance (general health) 16%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
9 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 1 document cites this program.
Program key prj:5180023