80 facts shown; 1 unconfirmed link; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 37 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Until recently, Thailand's hill people were largely neglected by the central government. Although numerous development programs, many attempting to introduce new cash crops as substitutes for opium poppies, have been introduced since 1970, the basic circumstances of the hill people remain unchanged. A nutrition survey in Chiang Mai showed that highland children are almost 50% deficient in protein. The average percent of hill people with no education is 76%, compared to the national average of 26%. Furthermore, 41% of the hill people have no ability in the Thai language. The purpose of this study, which was based on a study of documentary materials, interviews with various Thai government officials, and field studies, is to provide background information to be used in designing development projects for the hill people, especially a proposed Hilltribe Integrated Rural Development (HIRD) Project. This report consists of four parts: (1) a summary of findings and recommendations; (2) a brief characterization of the various hill people and a discussion of Thai government policy toward them; (3) an analysis of the dynamics of change in Northern Thailand; and (4) a survey of current socioe
Source: DEC abstract, PN-AAH-597 (1978). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Nepal, Asia, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Thailand, India, Pakistan, Southern Africa, Latin America, Philippines, Bangladesh, Middle East.
Years
1967 to 1987 years in documents
Implementer
Tribhuvan University. Centre for Economic Development and Administration; International Council for Educational Development; Arthur D. Little, Inc.; and 16 more 9 sources
Funder or award
Coordinating Committee for Private Sector Development; AID-367-421-T; AID/ASIA-G-1349
Purpose
Not available yet: the program's stated purpose has not been read from its documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. · Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. · Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: regional. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How we know this
How sure we are: 0.9.
OU code 498 = Asia Regional
evidence countries (8): Nepal 8, Indonesia 5, Thailand 5, Sri Lanka 5, India 3, Pakistan 2; top share 0.27, single-country share 0.27
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. · Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from first seen; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. · Source: initiative records, start year
Began during the Lyndon B. Johnson administration (1963–1969). Based on its first seen, 1967. This places the program in time only; it does not mean that administration started it.
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. · Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. · Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Economic opportunity (microenterprise, jobs, skills, poverty reduction) 21%; Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 14%; Energy (power, fuels, renewables, efficiency) 9%
Topic tags (15)
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Women in developmentDEC topic tag, PN-AAV-019, PN-AAV-020 and 3 more, 1979 to 1981, confidence 1; 9 records
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. · Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. · Source: document library
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
Fact value
000743 - Arthur D. Little, Inc.
Document
Private-sector power generation in Pakistan : potential, impediments, and policy issues, final report, an other usaid supported study/document from 1986 PN-AAV-132