FSR

Name source: not recorded for this programScope: country, PakistanKind: program

Key prj:3910489

38 facts shown; 6 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 70 documents cite this program.

The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.

The source describes FSR Projects in each province.1 The stated objective is a permanent resource base that supports FSR on a sustainable footing.1 Strategies have been articulated for FSR participating institutes and universities in each province.1

Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.

Operated in: Pakistan.

Years: 1985 to 1994 award start, end from document years
Implementer: Winrock International. Institute for Agricultural Development; International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA); International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); and 7 more 26 sources
Funder or award: USAID. Mission to Pakistan; 391-0489-C-5055; 391-0489-G-0501
Purpose: The stated objective is a permanent resource base that supports FSR on a sustainable footing.source

Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents

not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far

No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.

Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule

When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years

Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.

Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year

Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records

Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field

Organizations named on this program's documents.
Name	Role	Years	Basis	Evidence
Winrock International. Institute for Agricultural Development	implementer	1987 to 1993	Stated in a document	26 sources
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)	implementer	1989 to 1993	Stated in a document

Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records

Basis: read from a record field

Awards this program is funded through (identifiers, not amounts).
Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
391-0489-C-5055 (contract, fiscal year not recorded)	1987 to 1993	Stated in a document	28 sources
391-0489-G-0501 (grant, fiscal year not recorded)	1989 to 1993	Stated in a document	18 sources

Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags

Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets

Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents

Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title	Year	Document	Why listed
Farming system research : Shahkot Area -- mid-term review of FSR achievements	1989	PN-ABU-753	evaluation-stage document (eval midterm, weak classifier)
Farming systems research and NARC [National Agricultural Research Centre] master plan implementation, : report - I -- accomplishments, issues, recommendations	1990	PN-ABS-825	evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier)
Pilot to production programs : planning, monitoring and on-going evaluation	1991	PN-ABS-829	evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier)

Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.

Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library

Name	Role	Years	Basis	Evidence
Pakistan Agricultural Research Council	implementing agency	1989 to 1990	Likely, not confirmed	64 sources
Pakistan Agricultural Research Council. Arid Zone Research Institute	implementing agency	1989 to 1993	Likely, not confirmed	46 sources
Pakistan Agricultural Research Council. National Agricultural Research Centre	implementing agency	1993 to 1994	Likely, not confirmed	10 sources
Pakistan Agricultural Research Council. Agricultural Economics Research Unit	implementing agency	1990	Likely, not confirmed	6 sources
Pakistan. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Cooperatives	lead ministry	1993	Likely, not confirmed	1 source
Pakistan. National Agricultural Research Centre	implementing agency	1994	Likely, not confirmed	1 source

FSR

Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers

Host-government counterpartsthe government body the program worked with

Name	Role	Years	Basis	Evidence
Academy for Educational Development, Inc. (AED)	implementer	1992	Stated in a document	1 source
Techno-Consult Consulting Engineers	implementer	1989	Stated in a document	1 source

What this program was

Where it worked0

Places1

Timelineyears: award years, end from document years

Political context

Implementers10

Awards and funding sources6

Topic tags15

Similar programs

Evaluations and lessons5

Documents by lifecycle stage70years in documents

Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers

Host-government counterpartsthe government body the program worked with