Egypt programs / Egypt project 263-0017 · 1978–1984 · Consortium for International Development (CID)
In upgrading water control and delivery systems, the Egypt Water Use and Management Project chose to replace the below grade earth structure of a private irrigation canal (mesqa) serving 24 ha's with a raised design built of concrete… DEC abstract (PN-AAM-710)
Key prj:2630017
31 facts shown; 1 unconfirmed link; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 75 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The program was funded by the U. S. Agency for International Development under a grant agreement between the United States of America and the Arab Republic of Egypt.1 Colorado State University was the lead university for the program, with the Consortium for International Development as the contractor.1 A draft problem identification report identified agronomic, economic, sociological and engineering constraints in the Mansouria district.2
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Egypt. 2 other countries are only tagged on documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Egypt, 1978 to 1984 73 sources
Scope: country: Egypt. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from first seen; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consortium for International Development (CID) | implementer | 1978 to 1984 | Stated in a document | 59 sources |
| Colorado State University. Engineering Research Center | implementer | 1979 to 1984 | Stated in a document | 58 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| AID/NE-C-1351 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1978 to 1984 | Stated in a document | 58 sources |
| NEB-0017-C-0022 (contract, fiscal year not recorded) | 1983 to 1984 | Stated in a document | 14 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 38%; Natural resources and biodiversity (forests, wildlife, water resources) 22%; Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 10%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure for evaluating the cost of lifting water for irrigation in Egypt | 1984 | PN-AAT-150 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 1984 |
| Stated in a document |
| 2 sources |
| Democratic Republic of the Congo | 1982 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Colorado State University | implementer | 1981 to 1982 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| American Society of Agricultural Engineers | implementer | 1983 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Colorado State University. Dept. of Civil Engineering | implementer | 1984 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egypt. Ministry of Irrigation. Water Distribution Research Institute. Water Research Center | lead ministry | 1982 to 1984 | Likely, not confirmed basis not stated; shown as likely, not confirmed | 102 sources |
| 1984 |
| Stated in a document |
| 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Egypt | 1979 to 1984 | Stated in a document | 52 sources |
| Consortium for International Development (CID) | 1982 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| USAID. Mission to Egypt | 1980 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1978 to 1984 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 75 sources |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.