West Bank/Gaza programs / Promoting industrial zones and investment mobilization (PRIZIM)
Key awd:294-C-00-00071
33 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 34 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The PRIZIM project completed its second project year on September 27, 2001.1 Only about 22 percent of the base period contract budget remained available for year 3 PRIZIM activities.1 A PRIZIM assessment team was tasked with visiting nine principal Palestinian cities and towns.2 The program assisted PIEFZA in evaluating several potential Local Industrial Estates.3 Massar Associates, a PRIZIM partner firm, conducted demand surveys of potential users.4
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Place: not recorded.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
No operating country recorded. Scope is set from the countries the documents name most often, and none passed the rule.
Scope: country: West Bank/Gaza. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Services Group, Inc. (TSG) | implementer | 2001 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 34 sources |
| Massar Associates | implementer | 2002 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 294-C-00-00071 (contract, FY2000) | 2001 to 2003 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 34 sources |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to West Bank and Gaza | 2001 to 2003 | Stated in a document |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Private sector competitiveness 34%; Trade and investment 14%; Financial sector (banks, credit, microfinance, markets) 12%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 2001 to 2003 |
| Stated in a document |
| 28 sources |
| West Bank | 2001 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 27 sources |
| Middle East | 2002 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Louis Berger Group, Inc. |
| implementer |
| 2001 to 2002 |
| Stated in a document |
| 3 sources |
| Al Nasher Advertising Agency | implementer | 2002 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Universal Group for Engineering & Consulting | implementer | 2001 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Coverdale Organization, Inc. | implementer | 2002 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Al Jidara | implementer | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Engineering and Management Consulting Center (EMCC) | implementer | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICF Consulting | implementer | 2002 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Clydesdale International | implementer | 2003 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 34 sources |
| Palestinian Industrial Estates and Free Zone Authority (PIEFZA) | 2001 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 23 sources |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Bank/Gaza | 2001 to 2003 | Stated in a document | 28 sources |
| West Bank | 2001 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.