Global programs / Feed the future innovation lab for collaborative research on peanut productivity and mycotoxin control (PMIL)
Phosphorus (P) deficiency is a major constraint to crop production in many agricultural systems globally. DEC abstract (PA-00N-76K)
Key awd:ECG-A-07-00001
63 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 16 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Phosphorus (P) deficiency is a major constraint to crop production in many agricultural systems globally. Application of phosphorus fertilizer is essential for optimal crop yields when soils are P limiting. Crop simulation models can provide an alternative, less time consuming and inexpensive means of determining the optimum crop P requirements under varied soil and climatic conditions. The CROPGRO-peanut model is capable of simulating the growth and yield of peanut in response to weather, soil, water, nitrogen and management practices but its capability in predicting crop responses to soil and fertilizer P needs to be established. Our objective was to adapt and evaluate the CROPGRO-peanut model within the DSSAT system to simulate the growth and yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) in response to soil and fertilizer P. Data from four P fertilizer treatments (0, 13, 26 and 39 kg P ha(-1)) and two cropping seasons (2002 and 2003) experiments on an Alfisol were used to calibrate the model. The model was tested using two data sets from a P fertilizer x cultivar trial conducted on-station in 1997 and 1998 and P fertilizer x fungicide trials on-farm in 2002. The limited testing showed that
Source: DEC abstract, PA-00N-76K (2015). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Uganda, Ghana, Ukraine, India, Africa, Africa South of Sahara, Guyana, Asia.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. Medium confidence.
How sure we are: 0.727.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Georgia. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences | implementer | 2014 to 2017 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| University of Georgia | implementer | 2015 to 2017 | Stated in a document |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| ECG-A-07-00001 (cooperative agreement, FY2007) | 2014 to 2017 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 21 sources |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Bur. for Food Security. Ofc. of Agricultural Research and Policy | 2012 to 2015 | Stated in a document |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 37%; Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 23%; Agriculture: policy, land tenure and land reform 10%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| External evaluation report on the peanut collaborative research support program : a report submitted to the Bureau of Food Security, USAID | 2012 | PA-00K-6ND | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| North Carolina State University | implementer | 2014 to 2017 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| National Agricultural Research Organisation (Uganda) | implementer | 2015 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| University of Florida | implementer | 2015 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) | implementer | 2016 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Texas Tech University | implementer | 2016 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Makerere University | implementer | 2017 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 6 sources |
| U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) | 2015 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| USAID Bureau for Food Security | 2016 to 2017 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| et al. | 2015 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| USAID. Bur. for Food Security | 2017 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| University of Georgia | 2016 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) | 2016 to 2017 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) | 2011 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field