Global programs / Peanut collaborative research support program (Peanut CRSP)
The peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), also called groundnut, is grown extensively in tropical and subtropical parts of the world as an oil seed crop or a grain legume (Porter et al. DEC abstract (PN-ABK-528)
Key prj:9364048
80 facts shown; 3 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 56 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The program established collaboration with eight prime host countries.1 A 1996 annual evaluation of the program reviewed accomplishments since the 1994 External Evaluation Panel Report.2
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Thailand, Asia, Philippines, India, Georgia, Uganda, Indonesia, Burkina Faso, South America, China, Egypt, Senegal, West Africa, Niger, Pakistan, Africa South of Sahara, Nepal, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Burma.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.95.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Programs that came before or after this one. A stated link names a document; a likely link is read from the text. Source: succession links
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Georgia. Georgia Experiment Station. Peanut CRSP Management Entity | implementer | 1991 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 25 sources |
| International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) | implementer | 1993 to 1996 | Stated in a document |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAN-4048-G-0041 (grant, fiscal year not recorded) | 1989 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 26 sources |
| DAN-4048-G-2065 (grant, fiscal year not recorded) | 1985 to 1995 | Stated in a document | 25 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 42%; Health systems, policy and finance (general health) 16%; Agriculture: research, extension, training, technology 13%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peanut collaborative research support program : external evaluation report -- 1992 | 1992 | PD-ABG-898 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Peanut collaborative research support program : the external evaluation panel report for the peanut CRSP | 1994 | PD-ABK-164 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Peanut collaborative research support program : the external evaluation panel -- report for the peanut CRSP | 1996 | PD-ABN-086 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 9 sources |
| University of Georgia. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations. Georgia Experiment Station | implementer | 1985 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
| Texas A & M University (TAMU). Agricultural Experiment Station | implementer | 1987 to 1992 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| North Carolina State University. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences | implementer | 1990 to 1991 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Michigan State University | implementer | 1992 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| North Carolina State University. Agricultural Research Service | implementer | 1991 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| North Carolina State University. Dept. of Soil Science | implementer | 1991 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philippines. Ministry of Agriculture. National Science & Technology Authority. Philippine Council for Agriculture, Forestry & Natural Resources Research & Development | lead ministry | 1990 | Likely, not confirmed basis not stated; shown as likely, not confirmed | 6 sources |
| DAN-1310-G-6008 (grant, fiscal year not recorded) |
| 1997 |
| Stated in a document |
| 2 sources |
| DAN-4084-Z-8034 (other, fiscal year not recorded) | 1991 to 1992 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| 263-0152-G-1019 (grant, fiscal year not recorded) | 1994 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| DAN-1310-G-0045 (grant, fiscal year not recorded) | 1992 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
Basis: read from a record field
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Development Support | 1985 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 44 sources |
| Philippines | 1985 to 1990 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Thailand | 1990 to 1992 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Asia Regional | 1994 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Egypt | 1994 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| India | 1990 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Niger | 1991 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.