Global programs / MEASURE evaluation phase IV

MEASURE evaluation phase IV

Name source: not recorded for this programScope: globalKind: program

Key awd:OAA-L-14-00004

71 facts shown; 2 unconfirmed links; 1 support mechanism (not programs) 1 data error; 156 documents cite this program.

The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.

Background: Nearly 20 years after the adoption by the government of Malawi of the provision of intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) for malaria, only 55 % of pregnant women received at least two doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) in 2010. Although several reasons for the low coverage have been suggested, few studies have examined the views of health care providers. This study examined the experiences of the nurses and midwives in providing antenatal care (ANC) services. <br /> Methods: This study was conducted in health facilities in Malawi that provide routine ANC services. Providers of ANC in Malawi were selected from in eight health care facilities of Malawi. Selected providers were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide designed to address a series of themes related to their working conditions and their delivery of IPTp. <br /> Results: Nurses displayed detailed knowledge of ANC services and the rationale behind them. Nurses understood that they should provide two doses of IPTp during a pregnancy, but they did not agree on the timing of the doses. Nurses gave SP as directly observed therapy (DOT) at the clinic. Nurses did not give SP pills to

Source: DEC abstract, PB-AAG-083 (2015). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.

Operated in: Africa, Asia, Latin America, Nigeria, Caribbean, Bangladesh, Kenya, Botswana, Zambia, Ghana, Tanzania, Armenia, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Madagascar, Moldova, Mali, Namibia, Malawi, West Africa, Philippines, South Africa, Senegal, Burkina Faso, Africa South of Sahara, Lesotho, Southeast Asia, Dominican Republic, Zimbabwe, Southern Hemisphere.

Years: 2014 to 2022 award start, end from document years
Implementer: MEASURE Evaluation; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Carolina Population Center; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; and 5 more 129 sources
Funder or award: USAID; OAA-L-14-00004; OAA-I-15-00021
Purpose: Not available yet: the program's stated purpose has not been read from its documents.

Also regional, not drawn: Africa (2016 to 2022); Asia (2016 to 2022); Latin America (2017 to 2022); Caribbean (2017 to 2022); West Africa (2016 to 2018); Africa South of Sahara (2016 to 2018); Southeast Asia (2019); Southern Hemisphere (2019).

Africa 2016 to 2022
Asia 2016 to 2022
Latin America 2017 to 2022
2017 to 2019
Caribbean 2017 to 2022
2014 to 2019
2017 to 2019
2016 to 2020
2016 to 2019
2017 to 2020
2017 to 2020
2017 to 2020
2015 to 2020
2018 to 2019
2017 to 2018
2017 to 2020
2016 to 2020
2018 to 2019
2015 to 2017
West Africa 2016 to 2018
2019
2019
2015 to 2019
2019 to 2020
Africa South of Sahara 2016 to 2018
2019
Southeast Asia 2019
2017
2019
Southern Hemisphere 2019

Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents

Districts, regions and facilities named in the program's own documents, not verified sites. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far.

Sample Built from district names in Malawi documents while the full place data loads; it is not yet the finished place list.

Solid: the documents describe the program's work there. Faint: named in the program's documents. Bigger means more mentions. Shown: district, region or province; squares are facilities.

District · 7 mentions · 2015 to 2017
District · 3 mentions · 2015 to 2017
Region or province · 3 mentions · 2015
District · 1 mention · 2017
District · 1 mention · 2017

Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule

When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years

Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.

Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year

Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records

Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field

Organizations named on this program's documents.
Name	Role	Years	Basis	Evidence
MEASURE Evaluation	implementer	2016 to 2020	Stated in a document	129 sources
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Carolina Population Center	implementer	2014 to 2017	Stated in a document

Contracts and vehicles that served this program (evaluation, M&E, research). Never counted as programs. Source: document metadata

support mechanism: evaluated Award OAA-TO-17-00015 Stated in a document documents PA-00S-VGX

A support mechanism is never counted as a program.

Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records

Basis: read from a record field

Awards this program is funded through (identifiers, not amounts).
Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
OAA-L-14-00004 (other, FY2014)	2014 to 2022	Stated in a document	155 sources
OAA-I-15-00021 (idiq, FY2015)	2018	Stated in a document	1 source

Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags

Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets

Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents

Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title	Year	Document	Why listed
Rapport d’Evaluation du Système d’Information Sanitaire de Routine par l’Approche et les Outils PRISM	2015	PA-00K-H2Z	evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier)
Sample Monitoring and Evaluation of Scale-up Strategy for a Gender-Integrated Health Governance Project - Strategy Based on the Implementation and Evaluation of an Intervention to Strengthen Health Facility Operation and Management Committees in Nepal	2015	PA-00K-QNV	evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier)
USAID/Madagascar Health Survey, in the North and West Regions of the Community Capacity for Health (CCH) Intervention Zones, 2016	2017	PA-00M-QM4	linked as an evaluation of this program

Not recorded yet: money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.

Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library

MEASURE evaluation phase IV

Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers

Host-government counterpartsthe government body the program worked with

Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
USAID	2016 to 2022	Stated in a document	130 sources
USAID. Bur. for Global Health. Ofc. of HIV/AIDS	2014 to 2020	Stated in a document	20 sources
United Kingdom. Dept. for International Development (DFID)	2014 to 2015	Stated in a document	2 sources
U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)	2019	Stated in a document	2 sources
Bureau for Global Health	2015	Stated in a document	1 source
USAID. Mission to Tanzania	2017	Stated in a document	1 source
USAID. Bur. for Conflict Prevention and Stabilization. Ofc. of Transition Initiatives (OTI)	2018	Stated in a document	1 source
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)	2015	Stated in a document	1 source

Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
Bangladesh	2014 to 2015	Stated in a document	2 sources
Nigeria	2017 to 2018	Stated in a document	2 sources
Tanzania	2017 to 2020	Stated in a document	2 sources
Rwanda	2018 to 2019	Stated in a document	1 source
Zambia	2018	Stated in a document	1 source
Botswana	2019	Stated in a document	1 source

What this program was

Where it worked5

Places30

Timelineyears: award years, end from document years

Political context

Implementers8

Support mechanisms1

Awards and funding sources17

Topic tags15

Similar programs

Evaluations and lessons17

Documents by lifecycle stage156years in documents

Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers

Host-government counterpartsthe government body the program worked with