90 facts shown; 1 unconfirmed link; 1 support mechanism (not programs) 1 data error; 104 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The program has three stated objectives, including assisting villages in completing land use planning and delivering Certificate of Customary Rights of Occupancy (CCROs).1The program provides assistance to local level authorities in delivering land tenure services under Tanzania's village land laws.1The program's activity was extended to December 5, 2021 through Contract Modification No 6.2
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Tanzania. 3 other countries are only tagged on documents.
Years
2012 to 2021 award start, end from document years
Implementer
DAI Global, LLC; Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI) 83 sources
Funder or award
USAID. Mission to Tanzania; 621-TO-16-00005; OAA-I-12-00031
Purpose
The program has three stated objectives, including assisting villages in completing land use planning and delivering Certificate of Customary Rights of Occupancy (CCROs).source
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. · Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. · Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: country: Tanzania. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How we know this
How sure we are: 0.9.
OU code 621 = mission Tanzania
evidence countries (2): Tanzania 102, Indonesia 1; top share 0.99, single-country share 0.99
Only tagged on documentsnot program locationsnot program locations
Basis: read from a record field
These countries are tagged on documents. A tag is not evidence that the program operated there.
Name
Years
Basis
Evidence
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. · Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. · Source: initiative records, start year
Began during the Barack Obama administration (2009–2017). Based on its first award year, 2012. This places the program in time only; it does not mean that administration started it.
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. · Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. · Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Good governance 58%; Pandemic influenza, emerging threats and other public health threats 10%; Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 6%
Topic tags (15)
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Viral diseasesDEC topic tag, PA-00M-4K6, PA-00M-4R7 and 3 more, 2016 to 2021, confidence 1; 96 records
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. · Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. · Source: linked evaluation documents
Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title
Year
Document
Why listed
Phase II baseline and phase I midline report : impact evaluation of the Feed the Future Tanzania land tenure assistance activity