89 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 50 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The meta-evaluation synthesizes 31 evaluations and assessments that were conducted between 2016 and 2020. These reports evaluate $464 million USD in investment by USAID/Liberia and review the context and activities of seven major sectors and 20 subsectors.<br /><br />As a meta-evaluation, this report does not evaluate a particular activity, but rather reflects on the evaluation process and high-level findings that emerged across reports. What emerges is guidance for both future implementation and evaluations. To begin, the report illustrates a step-by-step process into evaluations, from research design to data collection to learning events. We provide examples of learning in action—specifically, from findings and challenges identified in evaluations and assessments conducted by Liberia Strategic Analysis (LSA). Each of the 31 reports is included in key highlights, examining first the main cross-cutting lessons. The Development Objectives (DOs) for Economic Growth, Health and Education, and Democracy, Rights, and Governance are further examined alongside standalone reports on gender and stakeholder consultation.<br /><br />However, findings do not necessarily generate learning unles
Source: DEC abstract, PA-00W-S5P (2020). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Liberia. 3 other countries are only tagged on documents.
Years
2012 to 2021 award start, end from document years
Implementer
Tetra Tech ARD; Social Impact, Inc.; Landesa 28 sources
Funder or award
USAID. Mission to Liberia; OAA-I-12-00032; 669-C-16-00002
Purpose
Not available yet: the program's stated purpose has not been read from its documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. · Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. · Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: country: Liberia. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How we know this
How sure we are: 0.9.
OU code 669 = mission Liberia
evidence countries (2): Liberia 49, Indonesia 1; top share 0.98, single-country share 0.98
Only tagged on documentsnot program locationsnot program locations
Basis: read from a record field
These countries are tagged on documents. A tag is not evidence that the program operated there.
Name
Years
Basis
Evidence
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. · Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. · Source: initiative records, start year
Began during the Barack Obama administration (2009–2017). Based on its first award year, 2012. This places the program in time only; it does not mean that administration started it.
No document or official record says which initiative or administration launched this program.
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. · Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. · Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Good governance 45%; Social policies, regulations and systems (incl. gender, population) 11%; Health systems, policy and finance (general health) 7%
Topic tags (15)
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
GovernanceDEC topic tag, PA-00W-RWH, PA-00W-RWM and 3 more, 2015 to 2020, confidence 1; 39 records
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. · Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. · Source: linked evaluation documents
Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title
Year
Document
Why listed
Institutional Audit of the Key Liberian Land Governance Institutions
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. · Source: document library
assessment8
Land Market Survey PA-00W-RWM
Land Governance Support Activity Inception Plan PA-00M-35CAssessment (Technical Assessment) 2015