Zambia programs / Local Impact Governance
(Zambia): Local Impact Governance supports the Government of the Republic of Zambia (GRZ) to strengthen participatory governance and the fiscal capabilities of local authorities for improved development planning, implementation, and… IATI activity description (US-GOV-1-72061121C00002)
Key awd:72061121C00002
20 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 3 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
(Zambia): Local Impact Governance supports the Government of the Republic of Zambia (GRZ) to strengthen participatory governance and the fiscal capabilities of local authorities for improved development planning, implementation, and performance management. With FY 2022 funds, the activity will: 1) help citizens and the private sector improve their collective skills to assess service delivery and constructively engage with government; 2) strengthen the sub-national governance system to become more responsive to citizen needs, generate revenue, and improve service-delivery outcomes; and 3) generate learning and facilitate problem solving that supports an effective, financially viable sub-national governance system. At the national Level, Local Impact will support the review of the Decentralization Policy to align it with the 2016 Constitution and the new Administration's priorities. The activity will also support the Government of Zambia to kick start sector devolution which is a key enabling approach for national decentralization of service delivery for key district services which are scheduled to be devolved within the next two years. Under USAID/Zambia's Country Development
Source: IATI activity description, US-GOV-1-72061121C00002 (2020). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Zambia.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAI Global, LLC | implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. | 2022 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 2 sources |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 72061121C00002 (contract, FY2021) | 2021 to 2022 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 3 sources |
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) | 2022 | Stated in a document |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Good governance 35%; Program management, planning and administration 22%; Water supply, sanitation and hygiene 17%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual Performance Report Local Impact Governance Project Fiscal Year 1: November 2, 2020 to September 30, 2021 | 2021 | PA-00Z-9WB | linked as an evaluation of this program |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 2 sources |
| U.S. Dept. of State and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) | 2021 | Stated in a document | 1 source |