Land Project (CIP)

Name source: not recorded for this programScope: country, RwandaKind: program

Key awd:696-C-12-00002

23 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 49 documents cite this program.

The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.

The program is a five-year project funded by USAID/Rwanda, initiated May 17, 2012.1 The overarching goal of the program is to support Rwanda's long-term sustainability by strengthening the resilience of its citizens, communities, and institutions.1 The contract is a Cost-Plus-Fixed Fee award with a total value of USD 11,979,786.1 A capability assessment reviewed twelve organizations, including four academic institutions, three government institutions, and five NGOs.2

Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.

Operated in: Rwanda. 2 other countries are only tagged on documents.

Years: 2012 to 2016 award start, end from document years
Implementer: Chemonics International Inc. 46 sources
Funder or award: USAID. Mission to Rwanda; 696-C-12-00002
Purpose: The overarching goal of the program is to support Rwanda's long-term sustainability by strengthening the resilience of its citizens, communities, and institutions.source

Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents

not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far

No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.

Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule

Operated in Rwanda, 2012 to 2016 48 sources

Scope: country: Rwanda. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.

How we know this

How sure we are: 0.9.

OU code 696 = mission Rwanda
evidence countries (1): Rwanda 48; top share 1.00, single-country share 1.00

Only tagged on documentsnot program locationsnot program locations

Basis: read from a record field

These countries are tagged on documents. A tag is not evidence that the program operated there.
Name	Years	Basis	Evidence

When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years

Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.

Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year

Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records

Organizations named on this program's documents.
Name	Role	Years	Basis	Evidence
Chemonics International Inc.	implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded.	2012 to 2016	Stated in a document read from a record field	46 sources

Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers

None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.

Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records

Awards this program is funded through (identifiers, not amounts).
Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
696-C-12-00002 (contract, FY2012)	2012 to 2016	Stated in a document read from a record field	49 sources

Basis: read from a record field

Funding and managing organizations.
Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
USAID. Mission to Rwanda	2012 to 2016	Stated in a document

Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags

Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets

Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents

Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title	Year	Document	Why listed
Final Narrative and Evaluation Report: Communications Campaign on Gendered Land Rights	2015	PA-00M-8HP	evaluation-stage document (eval final, weak classifier)

Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.

Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library

What this program was

Where it worked0

Places1

Only tagged on documentsnot program locationsnot program locations

Timelineyears: award years, end from document years

Political context

Implementers1

Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers

Awards and funding sources4

Topic tags15

Similar programs

Evaluations and lessons1

Documents by lifecycle stage49years in documents

Host-government counterpartsthe government body the program worked with