Georgia programs / Governing for Growth in Georgia (G4G)

Governing for Growth in Georgia (G4G)

Name source: not recorded for this programScope: country, GeorgiaKind: program

Key awd:114-C-14-00007

20 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 91 documents cite this program.

The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.

Governing for Growth (G4G) in Georgia is a five-year project funded by USAID and implemented by Deloitte Consulting LLP since August 2014.1 The program is designed to enhance governance in selected business enabling areas.2 Under its Water Resource Management Component, the program is building counterpart capabilities in developing computer models for water resource management policy and planning.2 The program launched the Insolvency Reform Advocacy Campaign to mobilize stakeholders and trigger the reform process.3

Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.

Operated in: Georgia.

Years: 2014 to 2018 award start, end from document years
Implementer: Deloitte Consulting, LLP 91 sources
Funder or award: USAID. Regional Mission for the Caucasus; 114-C-14-00007
Purpose: The program is designed to enhance governance in selected business enabling areas.source

Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents

not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far

No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.

Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule

When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years

Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.

Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year

Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records

Organizations named on this program's documents.
Name	Role	Years	Basis	Evidence
Deloitte Consulting, LLP	implementer Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded.	2016	Stated in a document read from a record field	91 sources

Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers

None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.

Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records

Awards this program is funded through (identifiers, not amounts).
Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
114-C-14-00007 (contract, FY2014)	2015 to 2018	Stated in a document read from a record field	91 sources

Funding and managing organizations.
Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
USAID. Regional Mission for the Caucasus	2015 to 2018	Stated in a document read from a record field

Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags

Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets

Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents

Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title	Year	Document	Why listed
Report on project implementation : piloting water allocation modeling using water evaluation and planning system in the Aragvi River Basin	2017	PA-00N-3T3	evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier)
Documentation and testing of the Aragvi River Basin planning model : evaluation of water management strategies, scenarios and analysis results	2017	PA-00N-3TS	evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier)

Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.

Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library

What this program was

Where it worked0

Places1

Timelineyears: award years, end from document years

Political context

Implementers1

Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers

Awards and funding sources3

Topic tags15

Similar programs

Evaluations and lessons2

Documents by lifecycle stage91years in documents