Global programs / Food for progress (FFPr)
<div>This is an assessment of the sustainability of three already-closed United States Department of</div> <div>Agriculture (USDA) Food for Progress (FFPr) projects in Benin, Guatemala, and Sri Lanka. DEC abstract (PA-00W-GZ8)
Key awd:78-955-51646
13 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 1 document cites this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
<div>This is an assessment of the sustainability of three already-closed United States Department of</div> <div>Agriculture (USDA) Food for Progress (FFPr) projects in Benin, Guatemala, and Sri Lanka. Conducted</div> <div>during 2017 to 2019 by the University of Minnesota (UMN), the purpose of this sustainability</div> <div>assessment is to understand which project activities have continued after USDA’s Food for Progress</div> <div>funded involvement ended, and what impacts are beneficiaries experiencing as a result. This report</div> <div>highlights the preliminary conditions, design elements, implementation strategies and project activities</div> <div>that are likely to facilitate the sustainability of Food for Progress project activities and impacts after a</div> <div>project has closed.</div>
Source: DEC abstract, PA-00W-GZ8 (2019). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Guatemala, Benin, Sri Lanka.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
Districts, regions and facilities named in the program's own documents, not verified sites. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far.
Sample Built from district names in Malawi documents while the full place data loads; it is not yet the finished place list.
Solid: the documents describe the program's work there. Faint: named in the program's documents. Bigger means more mentions. Shown: region or province; squares are facilities.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: global. Set by the countries the program's documents name most often. High confidence.
How sure we are: 1.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: years in documents. The start year comes from first seen; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
not in the map yet: no implementer recorded for this program
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
No implementer is recorded, so no organization is listed as running this program.
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 78-955-51646 (award, fiscal year not recorded) | 2019 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 1 source |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) | 2019 | Stated in a document |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Agriculture: crop production, inputs, pests, irrigation 66%; Agriculture, subsector not specified 8%; Agriculture: agribusiness, processing, marketing, agricultural finance 6%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Food for progress post-project sustainability assessment : multi-country evaluation | 2019 | PA-00W-GZ8 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 1 source |