Regional programs / Environmental policy and technology (EPT)
Final report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on a contract (10/93-9/96) to improve environmental management in Estonia. DEC abstract (PD-ABP-661)
Key prj:1100003
86 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 85 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
Final report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on a contract (10/93-9/96) to improve environmental management in Estonia. The report enumerates the many efforts made by EPA in the four main contract areas: (1) providing national and local environmental authorities with expert advisors from the EPA and from U.S. state and local environmental agencies; (2) providing local and national environmental authorities with management training in areas such as environmental impact assessment (EIA) and comparative risk assessment; (3) providing TA and training to help Estonian environmental authorities implement an EIA process and reduce the environmental risks to the Kurtna Lakes; and (4) improving the Estonian government's environmental monitoring system in order to improve environmental policymaking and to make it more compatible with the environmental data management in other Baltic nations. The project had impacts of great value. Most notably, the improvements effected in the information and technological infrastructure of the Ministry of the Environment and its institutions in order to meet the goals set up by the Ministry's agreement with EPA correspond totally with the
Source: DEC abstract, PD-ABP-661 (1996). This is the source's own text, not a cited summary of the documents.
Operated in: Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, New Independent States, Central and Eastern Europe, Estonia, Uganda, Lithuania, Poland, Latvia, Southern Africa, Kyrgyzstan, Latin America, Tajikistan, Baltic States, Indonesia.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: regional. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH2M Hill International Services, Inc. | implementer | 1994 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 49 sources |
| Harvard University. Harvard Institute for International Development (HIID) | implementer | 1997 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCN-0003-Q-3165 (task order, fiscal year not recorded) | 1994 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 40 sources |
| CCN-0003-P-4116 (pasa, fiscal year not recorded) | 1995 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 10 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Water supply, sanitation and hygiene 22%; Natural resources and biodiversity (forests, wildlife, water resources) 20%; Clean productive environment (pollution, climate, waste) 14%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-term evaluation report : environmental policy technology project (EPT), 110-0003 | 1995 | PD-ABM-029 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Mid-term evaluation report : environmental policy technology project (EPT), 110-0003 -- [Russian] | 1995 | PD-ABM-651 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Particulate sampling report : task 5 - industrial environmental audit of delivery order 10 - environmental policy and technology project | 1995 | PN-ACC-146 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) | implementer | 1995 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 7 sources |
| Iowa State University of Science and Technology. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| CH2M Hill | implementer | 1998 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Colorado State University. Dept. of Civil Engineering | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| World Wildlife Fund-U.S. (WWF-U.S.) | implementer | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| International Resources Group (IRG) | implementer | 1995 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institute for Sustainable Communities | implementer | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Ecologia | implementer | 1997 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Ofc. of International Activities | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 1997 to 1998 |
| Stated in a document |
| 8 sources |
| CCN-0003-Q-10-3165 (task order, fiscal year not recorded) | 1994 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| CCN-0003-Q-11-3165 (task order, fiscal year not recorded) | 1996 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| 118-0003-A-6177 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1996 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| AEP-0085-I-36-3002 (task order, fiscal year not recorded) | 1996 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| AEP-5451-I-24-2049 (task order, fiscal year not recorded) | 1995 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| 118-A-95-00303 (cooperative agreement, FY1995) | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| CCN-0003-Q-09-3165 (task order, fiscal year not recorded) | 1998 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| CCN-0003-Q-12-3165 (task order, fiscal year not recorded) | 1997 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| CCN-0003-Q-14-3165 (task order, fiscal year not recorded) | 1997 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1994 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 39 sources |
| Kazakhstan | 1994 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 14 sources |
| Uzbekistan | 1994 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 10 sources |
| NIS Regional | 1994 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
| Estonia | 1995 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| Lithuania | 1996 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Poland | 1996 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Turkmenistan | 1995 to 1996 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Central Asia Regional | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Ctr for Environment | 1997 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Latvia | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| 1996 |
| PD-ABP-575 |
| linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Mid-term evaluation of the CH2M Hill component of the environmental policy and technology project : volume four -- Central Asian Republic [i.e. Republics] annexes | 1996 | PD-ABP-577 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Evaluation of the influence of falling Aral Sea levels on precipitation in adjoining territories : applied demonstration project 5 | 1996 | PN-ACB-420 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Urban and industrial pollution programs : Russia case study | 2001 | PN-ACM-154 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| Reducing urban and industrial pollution in Russia | 2002 | PN-ACP-069 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.