Egypt programs / Egypt financial services (EFS)
Key awd:263-C-05-00003
27 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 79 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The program's overarching goal was to create the conditions to enable Egypt to legally transform real and personal property assets into resources for productive investment in the economy.1 The program worked with the Government of Egypt and the private sector to achieve three primary objectives.1 The program began in November 2004 with four main tasks.2
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Egypt. 3 other countries are only tagged on documents.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Operated in Egypt, 2005 to 2010 78 sources
Scope: country: Egypt. The award code belongs to this country's mission. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemonics International Inc. | implementer | 2005 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 78 sources |
| ShoreBank International, Ltd. | implementer | 2006 to 2007 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 263-C-05-00003 (contract, FY2005) | 2005 to 2010 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 80 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAID. Mission to Egypt | 2005 to 2010 | Stated in a document read from a record field |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Financial sector (banks, credit, microfinance, markets) 32%; Agriculture: policy, land tenure and land reform 17%; Rule of law and human rights 9%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows, evaluations and lessons. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| 2006 |
| Stated in a document |
| 2 sources |
| Arab countries | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Turkey | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) |
| implementer |
| 2006 |
| Stated in a document |
| 1 source |
| Chemonics Egypt | implementer | 2010 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Quality Standards for Information Technology (QSIT) | implementer | 2005 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 79 sources |
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 2005 to 2010 | Stated in a document read from a record field | 79 sources |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.