Global programs / Expanding Effective Contraceptive Options (EECO)

Expanding Effective Contraceptive Options (EECO)

Name source: not recorded for this programScope: globalKind: program

Key awd:OAA-A-13-00088

54 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 73 documents cite this program.

The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.

The program is designed to support the research, development and introduction of new contraceptive methods.1 The project dates are listed as October 2013 to September 2018.1

Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.

Operated in: Zambia, Africa South of Sahara, Malawi, Niger, Madagascar, Benin, Tanzania, South Africa, Nigeria, Philippines, India, Latin America, Southern Hemisphere, Ghana, Central Asia, East Asia, North Africa, South Asia.

Years: 2013 to 2023 award start, end from document years
Implementer: WCG Cares; WomanCare Global; Catalyst Global (formerly WCG Cares); and 13 more 46 sources
Funder or award: U.S. Dept. of State and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID); OAA-A-13-00088
Purpose: The program is designed to support the research, development and introduction of new contraceptive methods.source

Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents

Districts, regions and facilities named in the program's own documents, not verified sites. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far.

Sample Built from district names in Malawi documents while the full place data loads; it is not yet the finished place list.

Solid: the documents describe the program's work there. Faint: named in the program's documents. Bigger means more mentions. Shown: district; squares are facilities.

District · 25 mentions · 2016 to 2018
District · 20 mentions · 2016 to 2018

Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule

When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years

Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.

Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year

Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records

Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field

Organizations named on this program's documents.
Name	Role	Years	Basis	Evidence
WCG Cares	implementer	2015 to 2021	Stated in a document	46 sources
WomanCare Global	implementer	2014 to 2017	Stated in a document	16 sources

Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records

Awards this program is funded through (identifiers, not amounts).
Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
OAA-A-13-00088 (cooperative agreement, FY2013)	2014 to 2023	Stated in a document read from a record field	73 sources

Basis: read from a record field

Funding and managing organizations.
Name	Years	Basis	Evidence
U.S. Dept. of State and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)	2016 to 2019	Stated in a document

Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags

Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets

Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents

Evaluation studies and evaluation-stage documents, by title and year. Findings not extracted yet.
Title	Year	Document	Why listed
Expanding Effective Contraceptive Options: Expanded Management Review	2021	PA-00Z-67X	evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier)

Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.

Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library

Expanding Effective Contraceptive Options (EECO)

Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers

Host-government counterpartsthe government body the program worked with

Name	Role	Years	Basis	Evidence
International Center for Research on Women (ICRW)	implementer	2016	Stated in a document	1 source
FHI 360	implementer	2018	Stated in a document	1 source
AVAC, Catalyst Global, Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Population Council, Viatris, Population Services International (PSI), Mann Global Health	implementer	2023	Stated in a document	1 source
Catalyst Global, Innovations for Poverty Action, Population Council, Society for Family Health	implementer	2019	Stated in a document	1 source
Catalyst Global, Mann Global Health, Population Services International (PSI), Databoom	implementer	2023	Stated in a document	1 source
Catalyst Global, Population Services International (PSI), FHI 360	implementer	2023	Stated in a document	1 source
WCG Cares, Population Services International (PSI), PSI Madagascar, Society for Family Health (Nigeria), Society for Family Health (Zambia)	implementer	2022	Stated in a document	1 source
WCG Cares, Population Services International (PSI), PSI Niger	implementer	2022	Stated in a document	1 source

What this program was

Where it worked2

Places18

Timelineyears: award years, end from document years

Political context

Implementers16

Awards and funding sources5

Topic tags15

Similar programs

Evaluations and lessons1

Documents by lifecycle stage73years in documents

Evaluatorsassessed the program, never counted as implementers

Host-government counterpartsthe government body the program worked with