Regional programs / Equity and growth through economic research (EAGER)
Project to increase the use of economic and social research and analysis by public and private sector decision makers in sub-Saharan Africa. DEC abstract (PD-BCJ-215)
Key prj:6980546
116 facts shown; 0 unconfirmed links; 0 support mechanisms (not programs); 186 documents cite this program.
The one-paragraph answer: years, implementer, funder and purpose, each from document metadata.
The Equity and Growth through Economic Research (EAGER) program seeks to accelerate economic growth with equity in sub-Saharan Africa by effectively applying research to public policy.1 An AIRD Group team visited Mali, South Africa, Tanzania, and Kenya to initiate the EAGER trade project.2
Source: generated from documents. Each number opens the page it was written from.
Operated in: Africa South of Sahara, Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, Mali, Ivory Coast, Senegal, Africa, Southern Hemisphere, West Africa, Madagascar, Mauritius, Uganda, Sudan, Ethiopia, East Africa, Cameroon, Burkina Faso, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Zambia, Guinea, Mozambique, Central Africa, French speaking Africa, Benin, Botswana, Asia.
Districts, regions and facilities the program's own documents name, with what the document says it did there. Source: sentences in the program's documents
not in the map yet: no district, region or facility is named for this program yet; only Malawi and Guatemala have place data so far
No district, region or facility is named in this program's documents yet. Place dots exist for Malawi and Guatemala only so far. Towns and natural features are not drawn.
Countries where this program operated, set by the countries its documents name most often. Countries only tagged on documents are listed apart. Source: document tags, scope rule
Scope: regional. How the scope was set is not described yet. High confidence.
How sure we are: 0.9.
When the program ran, from its start year to the latest document year. A hatched bar means the start is our estimate. Source: award and document years
Axis: award years, end from years in documents. The start year comes from award fiscal year; the end is the latest document year, so the program may have run longer.
Who started the program, and which administration it began under. Timing only; it does not say who started it. Source: initiative records, start year
Organizations that ran this program, from award records and document authors. Prime and sub roles are not split yet. Source: award and document records
Named as an institutional author on documents; whether prime, sub or consortium member is not recorded. Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHM International, Inc. | implementer | 1997 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 65 sources |
| African Economic Research Consortium (AERC) | implementer | 1993 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 57 sources |
Identifiers of the awards and the organizations that funded it. Amounts are under Money. Source: award records
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| AOT-0546-Q-5271 (task order, fiscal year not recorded) | 1996 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 76 sources |
| AOT-0546-G-3181 (grant, fiscal year not recorded) | 1993 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 74 sources |
Labels on the program's documents, not a description of what the program did. Source: DEC document tags
Sector profile (computed): Macroeconomic foundation for growth 41%; Financial sector (banks, credit, microfinance, markets) 12%; Good governance 10%
DEC topic and subject tags. They describe the documents, not what the program was. Each tag opens its evidence in the drawer.
Programs worth reading next, by topic, implementer, country and years. Similar by facets (topic, implementer, country, years) and, when available, description. It says the programs look alike, not how they are related in time. Source: catalog facets
Looking for similar programs.
Studies that assessed this program, and the lessons taken from them. Source: linked evaluation documents
| Title | Year | Document | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial review of the Africa Economic Research Consortium (AERC) : grant no. AOT-0546-G-00-3181-00 | 1994 | PD-ABJ-185 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| AERC research programme : an evaluation | 1996 | PN-ACB-356 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Programme de recherche du CREA : une evaluation | 1996 | PN-ACB-357 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
Not recorded yet: support mechanisms, money rows. A missing record is not a finding. USAspending records start in FY2007; earlier obligations are missing, not zero.
Every document that cites this program, grouped by a stage label from a weak classifier. Source: document library
| Associates for International Resources and Development (AIRD) | implementer | 1995 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 28 sources |
| Harvard University. John F. Kennedy School of Government | implementer | 2000 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 21 sources |
| Council for the Development of Economic and Social Research in Africa | implementer | 1995 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 16 sources |
| Harvard University. Harvard Institute for International Development (HIID) | implementer | 1997 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 12 sources |
| Basic Health Management International (BHM) | implementer | 1996 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI) | implementer | 1997 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Name | Role | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Maryland. Center for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector (IRIS) | implementer | 1996 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| International Science and Technology Institute, Inc. (ISTI) | implementer | 1997 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Purdue University | implementer | 1999 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Cornell University. Div. of Nutritional Sciences. Cornell Food and Nutrition Policy Program | implementer | 1999 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Mayatech Corp. | implementer | 1996 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| REMIX | implementer | 1997 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Howard University | implementer | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| University of Massachusetts at Amherst | implementer | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| University of Cape Town | implementer | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
None recorded. Evaluation studies linked to this program are listed under Evaluations and lessons.
None recorded for this program. A counterpart appears only when a document names the government body and its role.
| 1996 to 2001 |
| Stated in a document |
| 70 sources |
| AOT-0546-A-5133 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1996 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 28 sources |
| AOT-0546-A-5073 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1996 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 27 sources |
| AOT-A-95-00073 (cooperative agreement, FY1995) | 1996 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 27 sources |
| AOT-0546-A-3178 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1999 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| AEP-I-04-96-90028 (task order, FY1996) | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| AEP-I-96-90028 (idiq, FY1996) | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| DHR-0015-A-0031 (cooperative agreement, fiscal year not recorded) | 1997 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PCE-C-95-00015 (contract, FY1995) | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| PCE-Q-95-00016 (task order, FY1995) | 2000 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
Basis: read from a record field
Basis: read from a record field
| Name | Years | Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Africa Regional | 1993 to 2002 | Stated in a document | 62 sources |
| Nigeria | 1994 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 18 sources |
| Ghana | 1993 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 13 sources |
| South Africa | 1994 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 13 sources |
| Mali | 1995 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 9 sources |
| Tanzania | 1994 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 8 sources |
| Senegal | 1995 to 1999 | Stated in a document | 7 sources |
| Ivory Coast [Cote d'Ivoire] | 1996 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 6 sources |
| Kenya | 1997 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| Uganda | 1994 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 5 sources |
| WEST AFRICA REGIONAL | 1997 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 4 sources |
| Cameroon | 1996 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Ethiopia | 1993 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Madagascar | 1998 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Sudan | 1997 to 1998 | Stated in a document | 3 sources |
| Burkina Faso | 1995 to 1997 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| East Africa (Regional Dev Office) | 2000 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Malawi | 1999 to 2001 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Zambia | 1995 to 2000 | Stated in a document | 2 sources |
| Benin | 1997 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Mozambique | 2001 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Niger | 1997 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Regional Ctr for Southern Africa (RCSA) | 1999 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| Zimbabwe | 1996 | Stated in a document | 1 source |
| 1996 |
| PN-ACB-336 |
| evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| The AERC research programme : an evaluation | 1996 | PN-ADR-028 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| African Economic Research Consortium : an evaluation and review | 1997 | PN-ACB-360 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
| Evaluation de l'impact des mesures d'incitation sur l'economie Beninoise | 1997 | PN-ACB-311 | evaluation-stage document (eval other, weak classifier) |
| EAGER [equity and growth through economic research] mid-term evaluation with follow-on activity implications | 1999 | PD-ABR-945 | linked as an evaluation of this program |
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.
No quote: this fact comes from a metadata field, shown as stored.